Literature DB >> 23360688

Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.

L Vazquez1, Y Nizamaldin, C Combescure, R Nedir, M Bischof, D M Dohan Ehrenfest, J-P Carrel, U C Belser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Conventional panoramic radiography, a widely used radiographic examination tool in implant treatment planning, allows evaluation of the available bone height before inserting posterior mandibular implants. Image distortion and vertical magnification due to projection geometry is well described for rotational panoramic radiographs. To assess the accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs, implants and metal balls positioned in the posterior mandible were used as radio-opaque reference objects. The reproducibility of the measuring method was assessed by the inter- and intraobserver agreements.
METHODS: Direct digital panoramic radiographs, performed using a Kodak 8000C (Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY), of 17 partially edentulous patients (10 females, 7 males, mean age 65 years) were selected from an X-ray database gathered during routine clinical evaluation of implant sites. Proprietary software and a mouse-driven calliper were used to measure the radiological length of 25 implants and 18 metal reference balls, positioned in mandibular posterior segments. The distortion ratio (DR) was calculated by dividing the radiological implant length by the implant's real length and the radiological ball height by the ball's real height.
RESULTS: Mean vertical DR was 0.99 for implants and 0.97 for balls, and was unrelated to mandibular sites, side, age, gender or observer. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were acceptable for both reference objects.
CONCLUSIONS: Vertical measurements had acceptable accuracy and reproducibility when a software-based calibrated measurement tool was used, confirming that digital panoramic radiography can be reliably utilized to determine the pre-operative implant length in premolar and molar mandibular segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23360688      PMCID: PMC3699017          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20110429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  34 in total

1.  Area-dependent enlargement ratios of panoramic tomography on orthograde patient positioning and its significance for implant dentistry.

Authors:  G Gomez-Roman; D Lukas; R Beniashvili; W Schulte
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).

Authors:  C A Lascala; J Panella; M M Marques
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT.

Authors:  R Marmulla; R Wörtche; J Mühling; S Hassfeld
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.

Authors:  Miet Loubele; Frederik Maes; Filip Schutyser; Guy Marchal; Reinhilde Jacobs; Paul Suetens
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-04-21

Review 5.  State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Reinhilde Jacobs; Miet Loubele; Filip Schutyser; Paul Suetens; Daniel van Steenberghe
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman; Predag Sukovic
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.

Authors:  H Tal; O Moses
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Characteristics of the Orthopantomograph OP 100.

Authors:  W C Scarfe; F E Eraso; A G Farman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles.

Authors:  R H Batenburg; K Stellingsma; G M Raghoebar; A Vissink
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1997-10

10.  Dimensional reproduction in direct digital rotational panoramic radiography.

Authors:  W D McDavid; S B Dove; U Welander; G Tronje
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1993-04
View more
  13 in total

1.  Impact of malpositioning on panoramic radiography in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Björn Riecke; Reinhard E Friedrich; Dirk Schulze; Clemens Loos; Marco Blessmann; Max Heiland; Johannes Wikner
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Accuracy of computerized vertical measurements on digital orthopantomographs: posterior mandibular region.

Authors:  Mohammad Assaf; Alaa' Z Abu Gharbyah
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2014-12-31

3.  Distortion of digital panoramic radiographs used for implant site assessment.

Authors:  Rayyan Abdulhamid Kayal
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

4.  The magnification in the lower third and second molar region in the digital panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Giedrė Trakiniene; Antanas Šidlauskas; Vilma Švalkauskienė; Dalia Smailienė; Julija Urbonė
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2017 May-Aug

5.  The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hakan Bilhan; Onur Geckili; Selda Arat Bilhan; Fatih Aycicek; Berkman Albayrak; Pelin Bozbulut; Fatma Unalan
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2015-01-31

6.  Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone.

Authors:  Zunan Tang; Xianchu Liu; Kejia Chen
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Bone Height Changes of the Mandibular Edentulous Ridge in Screw Retained Versus Telescopic Restorations for Completely Edentulous Patients.

Authors:  Eman Helal; Mohamed El-Zawahry; Ayman Gouda; Amr Hosny Elkhadem; Samira Ibrahim Ibrahim
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-18

8.  Availability of Software-Based Correction of Mandibular Plane for the Vertical Measurement of the Mandible in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Sang-Sun Han; Kwang-Min Lee; Kee-Deog Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Does cone-beam CT alter treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative implant planning using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Jorge Noriega; Carmen Castro; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Impact of Digital Panoramic Radiograph Magnification on Vertical Measurement Accuracy.

Authors:  Marc El Hage; Jean-Pierre Bernard; Christophe Combescure; Lydia Vazquez
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.