Literature DB >> 22499132

Effect of electric potential and current on mandibular linear measurements in cone beam CT.

S Panmekiate1, W Apinhasmit, A Petersson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare mandibular linear distances measured from cone beam CT (CBCT) images produced by different radiographic parameter settings (peak kilovoltage and milliampere value).
METHODS: 20 cadaver hemimandibles with edentulous ridges posterior to the mental foramen were embedded in clear resin blocks and scanned by a CBCT machine (CB MercuRay(TM); Hitachi Medico Technology Corp., Chiba-ken, Japan). The radiographic parameters comprised four peak kilovoltage settings (60 kVp, 80 kVp, 100 kVp and 120 kVp) and two milliampere settings (10 mA and 15 mA). A 102.4 mm field of view was chosen. Each hemimandible was scanned 8 times with 8 different parameter combinations resulting in 160 CBCT data sets. On the cross-sectional images, six linear distances were measured. To assess the intraobserver variation, the 160 data sets were remeasured after 2 weeks. The measurement precision was calculated using Dahlberg's formula. With the same peak kilovoltage, the measurements yielded by different milliampere values were compared using the paired t-test. With the same milliampere value, the measurements yielded by different peak kilovoltage were compared using analysis of variance. A significant difference was considered when p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Measurement precision varied from 0.03 mm to 0.28 mm. No significant differences in the distances were found among the different radiographic parameter combinations.
CONCLUSIONS: Based upon the specific machine in the present study, low peak kilovoltage and milliampere value might be used for linear measurements in the posterior mandible.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22499132      PMCID: PMC3608379          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/51664704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  28 in total

1.  Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology.

Authors:  D A Tyndall; S L Brooks
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-05

Review 2.  E.A.O. guidelines fo the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin.

Authors:  David Harris; Daniel Buser; Karl Dula; Kerstin Grondahl; David Haris; Reinhilde Jacobs; Ulf Lekholm; Richard Nakielny; Daniel van Steenberghe; Paul van der Stelt
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties.

Authors:  K Araki; K Maki; K Seki; K Sakamaki; Y Harata; R Sakaino; T Okano; K Seo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography.

Authors:  Kaoru Kobayashi; Shinji Shimoda; Yoichi Nakagawa; Akira Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Ruben Pauwels; Jilke Beinsberger; Bruno Collaert; Chrysoula Theodorakou; Jessica Rogers; Anne Walker; Lesley Cockmartin; Hilde Bosmans; Reinhilde Jacobs; Ria Bogaerts; Keith Horner
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a formula for protection of the patient and clinician.

Authors:  Philip Worthington
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Imaging technology in implant diagnosis.

Authors:  Christos Angelopoulos; Tara Aghaloo
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2011-01

8.  Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.

Authors:  M Loubele; R Bogaerts; E Van Dijck; R Pauwels; S Vanheusden; P Suetens; G Marchal; G Sanderink; R Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  G Carrafiello; M Dizonno; V Colli; S Strocchi; S Pozzi Taubert; A Leonardi; A Giorgianni; M Barresi; A Macchi; E Bracchi; L Conte; C Fugazzola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants.

Authors:  Y-K Kim; J-Y Park; S-G Kim; J-S Kim; J-D Kim
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  7 in total

1.  Influence of CBCT parameters on the output of an automatic edge-detection-based endodontic segmentation.

Authors:  J Michetti; M Georgelin-Gurgel; J-P Mallet; F Diemer; K Boulanouar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Prediction of detectability of the mandibular canal by quantitative image quality evaluation using cone beam CT.

Authors:  Yohei Takeshita; Mayumi Shimizu; Gainer R Jasa; Warangkana Weerawanich; Kazutoshi Okamura; Shoko Yoshida; Kenji Tokumori; Junichi Asaumi; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Effects of exposure parameters and slice thickness on detecting clear and unclear mandibular canals using cone beam CT.

Authors:  Gainer R Jasa; Mayumi Shimizu; Kazutoshi Okamura; Kenji Tokumori; Yohei Takeshita; Warangkana Weerawanich; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose.

Authors:  R Pauwels; O Silkosessak; R Jacobs; R Bogaerts; H Bosmans; S Panmekiate
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  The accuracy of linear measurements of maxillary and mandibular edentulous sites in cone-beam computed tomography images with different fields of view and voxel sizes under simulated clinical conditions.

Authors:  Rumpa Ganguly; Aruna Ramesh; Sarah Pagni
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-06-23

6.  Assessment of slice thickness effect on visibility of inferior alveolar canal in cone beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  Daryoush Goodarzi Pour; Banafsheh Arzi; Ahmad Reza Shamshiri
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

7.  Optimization of exposure parameters and relationship between subjective and technical image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ha-Na Park; Chang-Ki Min; Kyoung-A Kim; Kwang-Joon Koh
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2019-06-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.