Literature DB >> 17948069

Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces.

Yuko Yotsumoto1, Michael J Kahana, Hugh R Wilson, Robert Sekuler.   

Abstract

A series of experiments examined short-term recognition memory for trios of briefly presented, synthetic human faces derived from three real human faces. The stimuli were a graded series of faces, which differed by varying known amounts from the face of the average female. Faces based on each of the three real faces were transformed so as to lie along orthogonal axes in a 3-D face space. Experiment 1 showed that the synthetic faces' perceptual similarity structure strongly influenced recognition memory. Results were fit by a noisy exemplar model (NEMO) of perceptual recognition memory. The fits revealed thatrecognition memory was influenced both by the similarity of the probe to the series items and by the similarities among the series items themselves. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (MDS) showed that the faces' perceptual representations largely preserved the 3-D space in which the face stimuli were arrayed. NEMO gave a better account of the results when similarity was defined as perceptual MDS similarity, rather than as the physical proximity of one face to another. Experiment 2 confirmed the importance of within-list homogeneity directly, without mediation of a model. We discuss the affinities and differences between visual memory for synthetic faces and memory for simpler stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17948069      PMCID: PMC2034349          DOI: 10.3758/bf03193597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  45 in total

Review 1.  The psychophysics of perceptual memory.

Authors:  S Magnussen; M W Greenlee
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1999

2.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: testing the face-space framework.

Authors:  K Lee; G Byatt; G Rhodes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

4.  Natural and manufactured objects activate the fusiform face area.

Authors:  Jane E Joseph; Ann D Gathers
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face perception.

Authors:  Gunter Loffler; Gael E Gordon; Frances Wilkinson; Deborah Goren; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Quantifying facial expression recognition across viewing conditions.

Authors:  Deborah Goren; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Decay and interference effects in visuospatial short-term memory.

Authors:  G J Hole
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision.

Authors:  Maximilian Riesenhuber; Izzat Jarudi; Sharon Gilad; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Visual categorization and object representation in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  N Sigala; F Gabbiani; N K Logothetis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Auditory short-term memory behaves like visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Elina Kaplan; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  13 in total

1.  A Stimulus-Oriented Approach to Memory.

Authors:  Robert Sekuler; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-11-21

2.  Recognition and position information in working memory for visual textures.

Authors:  Yuko Yotsumoto; Michael J Kahana; Chris McLaughlin; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

Review 3.  How hippocampus and cortex contribute to recognition memory: revisiting the complementary learning systems model.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Homogeneity computation: how interitem similarity in visual short-term memory alters recognition.

Authors:  Shivakumar Viswanathan; Daniel R Perl; Kristina M Visscher; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

5.  Trial-to-trial carryover in auditory short-term memory.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A task-irrelevant stimulus attribute affects perception and short-term memory.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

7.  Intracranial electroencephalography reveals two distinct similarity effects during item recognition.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Robert Sekuler; Brian Litt; Armin Brandt; Gordon Baltuch; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  An electrophysiological signature of summed similarity in visual working memory.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Robert Sekuler; Hugh R Wilson; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-09-10

9.  Identity modulates short-term memory for facial emotion.

Authors:  Murray Galster; Michael J Kahana; Hugh R Wilson; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Why are some people's names easier to learn than others? The effects of face similarity on memory for face-name associations.

Authors:  Peter C Pantelis; Marieke K van Vugt; Robert Sekuler; Hugh R Wilson; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.