Literature DB >> 15924942

Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face perception.

Gunter Loffler1, Gael E Gordon, Frances Wilkinson, Deborah Goren, Hugh R Wilson.   

Abstract

The perception of a stimulus can be impaired when presented in the context of a masking pattern. To determine the timing and the nature of face processing, the effect of various masks on the discriminability of faces was investigated. Results reveal a strong configural effect: the magnitude of masking depends on the similarity between mask and target. Masking is absent for non-face masks (noise, houses), modest for scrambled and inverted faces and strongest for upright faces, even when they differ in size, gender or viewpoint from the targets. This suggests an extra-striate location for the masking (possibly FFA). Reduced but significant masking for isolated face parts (internal features or head shape) is consistent with holistic computations in face perception. The duration over which a face mask can impair face discrimination (130 ms) is markedly longer than previously assumed and is sufficient for iterative and feedback computations to be part of face processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15924942     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces.

Authors:  Yuko Yotsumoto; Michael J Kahana; Hugh R Wilson; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

2.  Facial expression discrimination varies with presentation time but not with fixation on features: a backward masking study using eye-tracking.

Authors:  Karly N Neath; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2013-07-23

3.  Perceiving crowd attention: ensemble perception of a crowd's gaze.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-08-14

4.  Interactions between concentric form-from-structure and face perception revealed by visual masking but not adaptation.

Authors:  Eric Feczko; Gordon L Shulman; Steven E Petersen; John R Pruett
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The wide window of face detection.

Authors:  Orit Hershler; Tal Golan; Shlomo Bentin; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Coarse-to-fine encoding of spatial frequency information into visual short-term memory for faces but impartial decay.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Face-identity change activation outside the face system: "release from adaptation" may not always indicate neuronal selectivity.

Authors:  Marieke Mur; Douglas A Ruff; Jerzy Bodurka; Peter A Bandettini; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Identity modulates short-term memory for facial emotion.

Authors:  Murray Galster; Michael J Kahana; Hugh R Wilson; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Curvilinear relationship between phonological working memory load and social-emotional modulation.

Authors:  Quintino R Mano; Gregory G Brown; Khalima Bolden; Robin Aupperle; Sarah Sullivan; Martin P Paulus; Murray B Stein
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2012-08-28

10.  What makes a cell face selective? The importance of contrast.

Authors:  Shay Ohayon; Winrich A Freiwald; Doris Y Tsao
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.