Literature DB >> 19210080

Trial-to-trial carryover in auditory short-term memory.

Kristina M Visscher1, Michael J Kahana, Robert Sekuler.   

Abstract

Using a short-term recognition memory task, the authors evaluated the carryover across trials of 2 types of auditory information: the characteristics of individual study sounds (item information) and the relationships between the study sounds (study set homogeneity). On each trial, subjects heard 2 successive broadband study sounds and then decided whether a subsequently presented probe sound had been in the study set. On some trials, the similarity of the probe item to stimuli presented on the preceding trial was manipulated. This item information interfered with recognition, and false alarms increased from 0.4% to 4.4%. Moreover, the interference was tuned so that only stimuli that were very similar to each other interfered. On other trials, the relationship among stimuli was manipulated to alter the criterion subjects used in making recognition judgments. The effect of this manipulation was confined to the trial on which the criterion change was generated and did not affect the subsequent trial. These results demonstrate the existence of a sharply tuned carryover of auditory item information but no carryover of the effects of study set homogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19210080      PMCID: PMC2744086          DOI: 10.1037/a0013412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  47 in total

1.  The role of interference in memory span.

Authors:  C P May; L Hasher; M J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

2.  On the role of space and time in auditory processing.

Authors:  S Shamma
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Higher order sequential effects in psychophysical judgments.

Authors:  P Petzold; G Haubensak
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-08

4.  Effects of training on memory-guided saccade performance.

Authors:  Kristina Visscher; Elizabeth Viets; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Interference and forgetting.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Repetition priming in visual search: episodic retrieval, not feature priming.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Alex O Holcombe; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

7.  Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.

Authors:  Michael Bunting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  The effects of frontal- or temporal-lobe lesions on susceptibility to interference in spatial memory.

Authors:  M L Smith; G Leonard; J Crane; B Milner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Auditory short-term memory behaves like visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Elina Kaplan; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  10 in total

1.  Event-based proactive interference in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Deepna T Devkar; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Distortions in recall from visual memory: two classes of attractors at work.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Auditory proactive interference in monkeys: the roles of stimulus set size and intertrial interval.

Authors:  James Bigelow; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  A task-irrelevant stimulus attribute affects perception and short-term memory.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

5.  Intracranial electroencephalography reveals two distinct similarity effects during item recognition.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Robert Sekuler; Brian Litt; Armin Brandt; Gordon Baltuch; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Posterior parietal cortex represents sensory history and mediates its effects on behaviour.

Authors:  Athena Akrami; Charles D Kopec; Mathew E Diamond; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The effects of practice schedules on the process of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Simone V Gill; Xia Pu; Nicole Woo; Daekyoo Kim
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

8.  Lateral orbitofrontal cortex promotes trial-by-trial learning of risky, but not spatial, biases.

Authors:  Christine M Constantinople; Alex T Piet; Peter Bibawi; Athena Akrami; Charles Kopec; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Robust priors for regularized regression.

Authors:  Sebastian Bobadilla-Suarez; Matt Jones; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  On the generalization of tones: A detailed exploration of non-speech auditory perception stimuli.

Authors:  Michael Schutz; Jessica Gillard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.