Literature DB >> 17940773

Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

Erik P Castle1, Fatih Atug, Michael Woods, Raju Thomas, Rodney Davis.   

Abstract

In this study we evaluated the impact of body mass index (BMI) on operative and perioperative parameters and surgical margin rates, in patients who underwent robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).We retrospectively reviewed 140 consecutive RARPs performed by the same surgical team. Patients were stratified based on BMI into two categories: Group I: non-obese (91 patients) and Group II: obese (49 patients). Intraoperative parameters evaluated were: total operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative complications, status of nerve sparing and pelvic lymph node dissection. Postoperative parameters evaluated included positive surgical margin rate, pathological Gleason score and pathological stage, final tumor volume, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. The two groups were statistically comparable for age, PSA, Gleason scores and clinical stages. Mean operative time was greater in the obese group at 300.5 min versus 247.3 min in the non-obese group. Mean EBL in obese patients and non-obese patients were 396.2 and 292.8 ml, respectively. Positive surgical margin rate was 26.5% in obese and 13.1% in non-obese patients. Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy in obese patients is a feasible procedure with acceptable perioperative outcomes and complications. In our study, obesity significantly but negatively affected operative and postoperative outcomes. Moreover, obesity was associated with higher grade tumors and higher incidence of positive surgical margins. Consequently, caution is advised in performing RARP in the obese patient in the early part of a learning curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17940773     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-007-0217-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  27 in total

1.  Robotic urologic surgery: is this the way of the future?

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Family history of prostate cancer and obesity in relation to high-grade disease and extraprostatic extension in young men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sabine Rohrmann; William W Roberts; Patrick C Walsh; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 4.104

4.  Radical perineal prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Philipp Dahm; Benjamin K Yang; Chas R Salmen; Judd W Moul; Tong J Gan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and body mass index: an assessment of 151 sequential cases.

Authors:  James A Brown; David M Rodin; Benjamin Lee; Douglas M Dahl
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Diet, obesity, and risk of fatal prostate cancer.

Authors:  D A Snowdon; R L Phillips; W Choi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  The impact of obesity on health related quality of life before and after radical prostatectomy (data from CaPSURE).

Authors:  Jason W Anast; Natalia Sadetsky; David J Pasta; William W Bassett; David Latini; Janeen DuChane; June M Chan; Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari; James Peabody
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Radical perineal prostatectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Judd Boczko; Arnold Melman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Impact of obesity on biochemical control after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a report by the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database study group.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; William J Aronson; Christopher J Kane; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; David Elashoff; Martha K Terris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  19 in total

1.  Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.

Authors:  Antonio Benito Porcaro; Marco Sebben; Paolo Corsi; Alessandro Tafuri; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Nelia Amigoni; Riccardo Rizzetto; Giovanni Cacciamani; Arianna Mariotto; Alberto Diminutto; Matteo Brunelli; Vincenzo De Marco; Salvatore Siracusano; Walter Artibani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-05

Review 2.  Preserving continence during robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; Adam Gordon; Blanca Morales; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Bilateral pulmonary emboli after bilateral mastectomy in a 15-year-old boy with hypogonadism: A case report.

Authors:  J R Piggott; Arjang Yazdani
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2010

4.  Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy outcomes in obese and extremely obese men.

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Adam C Reese; Lynda Z Mettee; Bruce J Trock; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes during the learning curve for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Venu Chalasani; Carlos H Martinez; Darwin Lim; Reem Al Bareeq; Geoffrey R Wignall; Larry Stitt; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Influence of Morbid Obesity on Surgical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Abeer Eddib; Alexandra Danakas; Shawna Hughes; Mehmet Erk; Caroline Michalik; Madusudanan Sathia Narayanan; Venkat Krovi; Pankaj Singhal
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2014-04-01

7.  [DaVinci robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: benefit for obese men? - A matched-pair analysis].

Authors:  B Beyer; K Kühne; K Böhm; J Schiffmann; H Heinzer; U Michl; H Huland; M Graefen; A Haese; T Steuber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Impact of obesity on functional and oncological outcomes in radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bulent Altay; Bulent Erkurt; Vahit Guzelburc; Murat Can Kiremit; Mustafa Yucel Boz; Selami Albayrak
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Influence of obesity on localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Qu; Bo Dai; Yun-Yi Kong; Kun Chang; Ding-Wei Ye; Xu-Dong Yao; Shi-Lin Zhang; Hai-Liang Zhang; Wei-Yi Yang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients: comparison with the open procedure.

Authors:  Jae Jun Bae; Seock Hwan Choi; Seok Hwan Choi; Tae Gyun Kwon; Tae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.