Literature DB >> 14691122

Impact of obesity on biochemical control after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a report by the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database study group.

Stephen J Freedland1, William J Aronson, Christopher J Kane, Joseph C Presti, Christopher L Amling, David Elashoff, Martha K Terris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Given the limited information regarding the impact of obesity on treatment outcomes for prostate cancer, we sought to examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and cancer control after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared clinicopathologic and biochemical outcome information across BMI groups from 1,106 men treated with RP between 1988 and 2002. Multivariate analysis was used to determine if BMI significantly predicted adverse pathology or biochemical recurrence.
RESULTS: Obesity was related to year of surgery (P <.001) and race (P <.001), with black men having the highest obesity rates. Obese patients had higher biopsy and pathologic grade tumors (P <.001). On multivariate analysis, BMI > or = 35 kg/m(2) was associated with a trend for higher rates of positive surgical margins (P =.008). Overweight patients (BMI, 25 to 30 kg/m(2)) had a significantly decreased risk of seminal vesicle invasion (P =.039). After controlling for all preoperative clinical variables including year of surgery, BMI > or = 35 kg/m(2) significantly predicted biochemical failure after RP (P =.002). After controlling for surgical margin status, BMI > or = 35 kg/m(2) remained a significant predictor of biochemical failure (P =.012). There was a trend for BMI > or = 35 kg/m(2) to be associated with higher failure rates than BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m(2) (P =.053).
CONCLUSION: The percentage of obese men undergoing RP in our data set doubled in the last 10 years. Obesity was associated with higher-grade tumors, a trend toward increased risk of positive surgical margins, and higher biochemical failure rates among men treated with RP. A BMI > or = 35 kg/m(2) was associated with a higher risk of failure than a BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m(2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14691122     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  103 in total

1.  Significance of smoking status regarding outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jong Jin Oh; Sung Kyu Hong; Chang Wook Jeong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Energetics in colorectal and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Jing Ma; Kerry S Courneya
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Obesity and prostate cancer detection and progression.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

4.  Is Body Mass Index the Best Adiposity Measure for Prostate Cancer Risk? Results From a Veterans Affairs Biopsy Cohort.

Authors:  Lourdes Guerrios-Rivera; Lauren Howard; Jennifer Frank; Amanda De Hoedt; Devon Beverly; Delores J Grant; Cathrine Hoyo; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The Association of Diabetes and Obesity With Prostate Cancer Progression: HCaP-NC.

Authors:  Saira Khan; Jianwen Cai; Matthew E Nielsen; Melissa A Troester; James L Mohler; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Laura H Hendrix; Laura Farnan; Andrew F Olshan; Jeannette T Bensen
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Oxidative stress measured by urine F2-isoprostane level is associated with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; Saundra Motley; Michael S Cookson; Sam S Chang; David F Penson; Qi Dai; Ginger Milne; L Jackson Roberts; Jason Morrow; Raoul S Concepcion; Joseph A Smith; Jay H Fowke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Body mass index as a classifier to predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with lower prostate-specific antigen levels.

Authors:  Keisuke Goto; Hirotaka Nagamatsu; Jun Teishima; Yuki Kohada; Shinsuke Fujii; Yoshimasa Kurimura; Koji Mita; Masanobu Shigeta; Satoshi Maruyama; Yoji Inoue; Mitsuru Nakahara; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-10

8.  Low body mass index is associated with adverse oncological outcomes following radical prostatectomy in Korean prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Kyo Chul Koo; Young Eun Yoon; Koon Ho Rha; Byung Ha Chung; Seung Choul Yang; Sung Joon Hong
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Biological mediators of effect of diet and stress reduction on prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gordon A Saxe; Jacqueline M Major; Lindsey Westerberg; Srikrishna Khandrika; Tracy M Downs
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.279

10.  Impact of body mass index on biochemical recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy: an analysis utilizing propensity score matching.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.