Literature DB >> 30953271

Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.

Antonio Benito Porcaro1, Marco Sebben2, Paolo Corsi2, Alessandro Tafuri2, Tania Processali2, Marco Pirozzi2, Nelia Amigoni2, Riccardo Rizzetto2, Giovanni Cacciamani2, Arianna Mariotto2, Alberto Diminutto2, Matteo Brunelli3, Vincenzo De Marco2, Salvatore Siracusano2, Walter Artibani2.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical, pathological and peri-operative factors associated with the risk of positive surgical margins (PSM) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a high-volume center. The study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We excluded cases who were under androgen deprivation or had prior treatments. The population included negative cases (control group) and PSM subjects (study groups). The logistic regression model assessed the independent association of factors with the risk of PSM. From January 2013 to December 2017, 732 patients underwent RARP. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 342 cases (46.7%). Overall, 192 cases (26.3%) had PSM. Independent factors associated with the risk of focal PSM were body mass index (odds ratio, OR = 0.936; p = 0.021), percentage of biopsy-positive cores (BPC; OR = 1.012; p = 0.004), pathological extracapsular extension (OR = 2.702; p < 0.0001), seminal vesicle invasion (OR = 2.889; p < 0.0001) and high-volume surgeon (OR = 0.607; p = 0.006). In high-volume centers, features related to host, tumor biology and surgeon are independent factors associated with the risk of PSM after RARP, which are decreased by the high-volume surgeon. The inverse association between BMI and PSM risk needs further clinical research. These issues should be discussed when counseling patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Positive surgical margins; Prostate cancer; Prostate cancer tumor-grade groups; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 30953271     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00954-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  40 in total

1.  Body mass index is an independent predictor of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications in patients undergoing robot assisted radical prostatectomy with extensive pelvic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Antonio Benito Porcaro; Marco Sebben; Alessandro Tafuri; Nicolò de Luyk; Paolo Corsi; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Riccardo Rizzetto; Nelia Amigoni; Daniele Mattevi; Maria A Cerruto; Matteo Brunelli; Giovanni Novella; Vincenzo De Marco; Filippo Migliorini; Walter Artibani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-08

2.  Systematic Review of the Volume-Outcome Relationship for Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Eugene K Leong; Emily C Serrell; Steven L Chang; Russell L Gruen; Keng Siang Png; Lisa T Beaule; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Mani M Menon; Jesse D Sammon
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-04-06

3.  Oncologic Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Large European Single-centre Cohort with Median 10-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajan; Anna Hagman; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Tommy Nyberg; Anna Wallerstedt; Christofer Adding; Olof Akre; Stefan Carlsson; Abolfazl Hosseini; Mats Olsson; Lars Egevad; Fredrik Wiklund; Gunnar Steineck; N Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2016-11-02

4.  Positive surgical margins and early oncological outcomes of robotic vs open radical prostatectomy at a medium case-load institution.

Authors:  Alessandro Antonelli; Mario Sodano; Angelo Peroni; Irene Mittino; Carlotta Palumbo; Maria Furlan; Francesca Carobbio; Regina Tardanico; Simona Fisogni; Claudio Simeone
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.720

5.  Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Tumor Upgrading in the Surgical Specimen: Analysis of Clinical Factors Predicting Tumor Upgrading in a Contemporary Series of Patients Who were Evaluated According to the Modified Gleason Score Grading System.

Authors:  Antonio B Porcaro; Salvatore Siracusano; Nicolò de Luyk; Paolo Corsi; Marco Sebben; Alessandro Tafuri; Daniele Mattevi; Leonardo Bizzotto; Irene Tamanini; Maria A Cerruto; Guido Martignoni; Matteo Brunelli; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-07-30

Review 6.  Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.

Authors:  Francesco Montorsi; Timothy G Wilson; Raymond C Rosen; Thomas E Ahlering; Walter Artibani; Peter R Carroll; Anthony Costello; James A Eastham; Vincenzo Ficarra; Giorgio Guazzoni; Mani Menon; Giacomo Novara; Vipul R Patel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Henk Van der Poel; Hein Van Poppel; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization.

Authors:  Philip A Fontenot; Ahmed M Mansour
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Erik P Castle; Fatih Atug; Michael Woods; Raju Thomas; Rodney Davis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Qin Wang; Chris L Pashos; Stuart R Lipsitz; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Alberto Briganti; James A Eastham; Jonathan Epstein; Markus Graefen; Rodolfo Montironi; Karim Touijer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  7 in total

1.  Development and clinical applicability of MRI-based 3D prostate models in the planning of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hans Veerman; Thierry N Boellaard; Jari A van der Eijk; Judith H Sluijter; Ton A Roeleveld; Tim M van der Sluis; Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen; Esther Wit; Maarten J A van Alphen; Robert L P van Veen; André N Vis; Henk G van der Poel; Pim J van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-07-12

2.  High surgeon volume and positive surgical margins can predict the risk of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Antonio Benito Porcaro; Alessandro Tafuri; Marco Sebben; Nelia Amigoni; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Riccardo Rizzetto; Aliasger Shakir; Paolo Corsi; Leone Tiso; Clara Cerrato; Filippo Migliorini; Giovanni Novella; Matteo Brunelli; Riccardo Bernasconi; Vincenzo De Marco; Salvatore Siracusano; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-09-24

3.  Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.

Authors:  Antonio B Porcaro; Alessandro Tafuri; Marco Sebben; Paolo Corsi; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Nelia Amigoni; Riccardo Rizzetto; Aliasger Shakir; Giovanni Cacciamani; Arianna Mariotto; Matteo Brunelli; Riccardo Bernasconi; Giovanni Novella; Vincenzo De Marco; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-05-30

4.  Obesity leads to a higher rate of positive surgical margins in the context of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Christopher Goßler; Matthias May; Bernd Rosenhammer; Johannes Breyer; Gjoko Stojanoski; Steffen Weikert; Sebastian Lenart; Anton Ponholzer; Christina Dreissig; Maximilian Burger; Christian Gilfrich; Johannes Bründl
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-12-03

Review 5.  Radical or Not-So-Radical Prostatectomy: Do Surgical Margins Matter?

Authors:  Ioanna Maria Grypari; Vasiliki Zolota; Vasiliki Tzelepi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Patients With Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lijin Zhang; Hu Zhao; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Jun Yuan; Yejun Feng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  ABO blood group system and risk of positive surgical margins in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results in 1114 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Nelia Amigoni; Filippo Migliorini; Antonio Benito Porcaro; Riccardo Rizzetto; Alessandro Tafuri; Pierluigi Piccoli; Leone Tiso; Clara Cerrato; Alberto Bianchi; Sebastian Gallina; Rossella Orlando; Mario De Michele; Alessandra Gozzo; Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli; Vincenzo De Marco; Matteo Brunelli; Maria Angela Cerruto; Walter Artibani; Salvatore Siracusano; Alessandro Antonelli
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-06-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.