Literature DB >> 20694101

Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes during the learning curve for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Venu Chalasani1, Carlos H Martinez, Darwin Lim, Reem Al Bareeq, Geoffrey R Wignall, Larry Stitt, Stephen E Pautler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) have suggested that obesity is a risk factor for worse perioperative outcomes. We evaluated whether body mass index (BMI) adversely affected perioperative outcomes.
METHODS: A prospective database of 153 RARP (single surgeon) was analyzed. Obesity was defined as BMI >/= 30 kg/m(2); normal BMI < 25 kg/m(2); and overweight as 25 to 30 kg/m(2). Two separate analyses were performed: the first 50 cases (the initial learning curve) and the entire cohort of 153 RARP.
RESULTS: In the initial cohort of 50 cases (14 obese patients), there was no statistically significant difference with regards to operative times, port-placement times and estimated blood loss (EBL). Length of stay (LOS) was longer in the obese group (4.3 vs. 2.9 days); BMI remained an independent predictor of increased LOS on multivariate linear regression analysis (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative outcomes of leak rates, margin rates and incisional herniae. In the entire cohort, when comparing obese patients to those with a normal BMI, there was no statistically significant difference in operative times, EBL, LOS, or immediate postoperative outcomes. However, on multivariate linear regression analysis, BMI was an independent predictor of increased operative time (p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Obese patients do not have an increased risk of blood loss, positive margins or the postoperative complications of incisional hernia and leak during the learning curve. They do, however, have slightly longer operative times; we also noted an increased LOS in our first 50 cases.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20694101      PMCID: PMC2910769          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.09083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  20 in total

1.  Initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Canadian health care system.

Authors:  Joseph L Chin; Patrick P Luke; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Does obesity influence the operative course or complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herkanwal S Khaira; Franck Bruyere; Patrick J O'Malley; Justin S Peters; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management: evidentiary base.

Authors:  Joseph L Chin; John Srigley; Linda A Mayhew; R Bryan Rumble; Claire Crossley; Amber Hunter; Neil Fleshner; Bish Bora; Robin McLeod; Sheila McNair; Bernard Langer; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes.

Authors:  Aimee L Wiltz; Sergey Shikanov; Scott E Eggener; Mark H Katz; Alan E Thong; Gary D Steinberg; Arieh L Shalhav; Gregory P Zagaja; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Impact of obesity on clinicopathologic outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; Paul L Crispen; Rachel E Carlson; Laureano J Rangel; R Jeffrey Karnes; Igor Frank; Matthew T Gettman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Significant lipid, adiposity and metabolic abnormalities amongst 4535 Indians from a developing region of rural Andhra Pradesh.

Authors:  Clara Kayei Chow; Shanthi Naidu; Krishnam Raju; Rama Raju; Rohina Joshi; David Sullivan; David S Celermajer; Bruce C Neal
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 5.162

7.  Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Erik P Castle; Fatih Atug; Michael Woods; Raju Thomas; Rodney Davis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  State-specific prevalence of obesity among adults--United States, 2007.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience of robotic surgery in Taiwan.

Authors:  Sheng-Tang Wu; Ke-Hung Tsui; Shou-Hung Tang; Dai-Lung Char; Dah-Shyong Yu; Chung-Yran Yen; Sun-Yran Chang; Hong-I Chen; Guang-Huan Sun
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Increasing body mass index negatively impacts outcomes following robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael P Herman; Jay D Raman; Steven Dong; David Samadi; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

1.  Robotic surgery techniques for obese patients.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Obesity and Kidney Stone Procedures.

Authors:  Nikhi P Singh; Carter J Boyd; William Poore; Kyle Wood; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2020

3.  Clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tomohiko Murakami; Satoshi Otsubo; Ryo Namitome; Masaki Shiota; Junichi Inokuchi; Ario Takeuchi; Eiji Kashiwagi; Katsunori Tatsugami; Masatoshi Eto
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-13

4.  Handling difficult anastomosis. Tips and tricks in obese patients and narrow pelvis.

Authors:  Srinivas Samavedi; Haidar Abdul-Muhsin; Suneel Pigilam; Ananth Sivaraman; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.