Literature DB >> 23859532

Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy outcomes in obese and extremely obese men.

Debasish Sundi1, Adam C Reese, Lynda Z Mettee, Bruce J Trock, Christian P Pavlovich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the operative and pathologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with progressive changes in body mass index (BMI) category.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-surgeon series of 1023 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (mostly extraperitoneal) patients was considered. Of these patients, 987 were evaluable. Results were stratified by the World Health Organization BMI category. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analysis was used to model the operating time, length of stay, positive surgical margins, and noncurable cancer.
RESULTS: Of the 987 patients, 563 (57%) were overweight and 193 (19.6%) were obese. Of the 193 obese patients, 152 (15.4%) had a BMI of 30 to <35 kg/m(2) (class I obesity), 28 (2.8%) a BMI of 35 to <40 kg/m(2) (class II), and 13 (1.3%) a BMI of ≥40 kg/m(2) (class III). No differences were found in the estimated blood loss, complications, PSM, pathologic stage, or biochemical recurrence across the BMI categories (6-month median follow-up). However, pelvic lymph node dissection was more commonly omitted and the nerve-sparing score was inferior in the obese men. On multivariate analysis, a higher BMI was a significant predictor of a longer operating time.
CONCLUSION: Obese men can safely undergo laparoscopic radical prostatectomy or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, although the ability to perform excellent nerve sparing appears to decrease with increasing obesity. Nevertheless, obese men can expect perioperative and early oncologic outcomes comparable to those of normal weight men without an increased risk of perioperative complications.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23859532      PMCID: PMC3758791          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  28 in total

1.  Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Elias I Hsu; Eugene K Hong; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Subjective characterization of nerve sparing predicts recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy: defining the utility of a nerve sparing grading system.

Authors:  Daniel J Moskovic; Hannah Alphs; Christian J Nelson; Farhang Rabbani; James Eastham; Karim Touijer; Bertrand Guillonneau; Peter T Scardino; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  High body mass index does not affect outcomes following robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniel J Moskovic; Hugh J Lavery; Jamil Rehman; Fatima Nabizada-Pace; Jonathan Brajtbord; David B Samadi
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique.

Authors:  B Guillonneau; G Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and body mass index: an assessment of 151 sequential cases.

Authors:  James A Brown; David M Rodin; Benjamin Lee; Douglas M Dahl
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  J I Epstein; G Pizov; P C Walsh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Impact of body mass index on perioperative morbidity, oncological, and functional outcomes after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alexandre Campeggi; Evanguelos Xylinas; Guillaume Ploussard; Idir Ouzaid; Alban Fabre; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Claude C Abbou; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Minh Do; Heidemarie Pfeiffer; Fritjoff König; Bernd Aedtner; Wolfgang Dorschner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Pathologic variables and recurrence rates as related to obesity and race in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christopher L Amling; Robert H Riffenburgh; Leon Sun; Judd W Moul; Raymond S Lance; Leo Kusuda; Wade J Sexton; Douglas W Soderdahl; Timothy F Donahue; John P Foley; Andrew K Chung; David G McLeod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Impact of obesity on biochemical control after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a report by the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database study group.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; William J Aronson; Christopher J Kane; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; David Elashoff; Martha K Terris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  7 in total

1.  Performance of Kymerax© precision-drive articulating surgical system compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments in a pelvitrainer model.

Authors:  Marco Alain Sieber; Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer; Michael Mueller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Open Versus Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Obese Men.

Authors:  Chandy Ellimoottil; Florian Roghmann; Robert Blackwell; Adam Kadlec; Kristin Greco; Marcus L Quek; Maxine Sun; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Gopal Gupta
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2015-09-04

3.  The Institute of Urology, Peking University prostatectomy score: a simple preoperative classification of prostate cancer for predicting surgical difficulty and risk.

Authors:  Bing-Lei Ma; Lin Yao; Wei Yu; Yu Wang; Hai-Feng Song; Zhe-Nan Zhang; Si-Meng Lu; Qian Zhang; Zhi-Song He; Jie Jin; Li-Qun Zhou
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Obesity leads to a higher rate of positive surgical margins in the context of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Christopher Goßler; Matthias May; Bernd Rosenhammer; Johannes Breyer; Gjoko Stojanoski; Steffen Weikert; Sebastian Lenart; Anton Ponholzer; Christina Dreissig; Maximilian Burger; Christian Gilfrich; Johannes Bründl
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-12-03

5.  Increased body mass index is associated with operative difficulty during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniel D Shapiro; John W Davis; Wendell H Williams; Brian F Chapin; John F Ward; Curtis A Pettaway; Justin R Gregg
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-09-27

6.  Patient-reported quality of life recovery curves after robotic prostatectomy are similar across body mass index categories.

Authors:  Tullika Garg; Amanda J Young; Korey A Kost; Alyssa M Park; John F Danella; H Lester Kirchner
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-08-03

Review 7.  Complications in robotic urological surgeries and how to avoid them: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rafael Rocha Tourinho-Barbosa; Marcos Tobias-Machado; Adalberto Castro-Alfaro; Gabriel Ogaya-Pinies; Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-12-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.