Literature DB >> 17929172

Biomolecular structure refinement based on adaptive restraints using local-elevation simulation.

Markus Christen1, Bettina Keller, Wilfred F van Gunsteren.   

Abstract

Introducing experimental values as restraints into molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to bias the values of particular molecular properties, such as nuclear Overhauser effect intensities or distances, dipolar couplings, 3 J-coupling constants, chemical shifts or crystallographic structure factors, towards experimental values is a widely used structure refinement method. Because multiple torsion angle values varphi correspond to the same 3 J-coupling constant and high-energy barriers are separating those, restraining 3 J-coupling constants remains difficult. A method to adaptively enforce restraints using a local elevation (LE) potential energy function is presented and applied to 3 J-coupling constant restraining in an MD simulation of hen egg-white lysozyme (HEWL). The method succesfully enhances sampling of the restrained torsion angles until the 37 experimental 3 J-coupling constant values are reached, thereby also improving the agreement with the 1,630 experimental NOE atom-atom distance upper bounds. Afterwards the torsional angles varphi are kept restrained by the built-up local-elevation potential energies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17929172     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-007-9194-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  19 in total

1.  A refined solution structure of hen lysozyme determined using residual dipolar coupling data.

Authors:  H Schwalbe; S B Grimshaw; A Spencer; M Buck; J Boyd; C M Dobson; C Redfield; L J Smith
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Alessandra Villa; Alan E Mark; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Self-consistent 3J coupling analysis for the joint calibration of Karplus coefficients and evaluation of torsion angles.

Authors:  J M Schmidt; M Blümel; F Löhr; H Rüterjans
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Philippe H Hünenberger; Dirk Bakowies; Riccardo Baron; Roland Bürgi; Daan P Geerke; Tim N Heinz; Mika A Kastenholz; Vincent Kräutler; Chris Oostenbrink; Christine Peter; Daniel Trzesniak; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Thereza A Soares; Nico F A van der Vegt; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  A reassessment of the structure of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI-2) using time-averaged NMR restraints.

Authors:  A P Nanzer; F M Poulsen; W F van Gunsteren; A E Torda
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-12-06       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Recommendations for the presentation of NMR structures of proteins and nucleic acids. IUPAC-IUBMB-IUPAB Inter-Union Task Group on the Standardization of Data Bases of Protein and Nucleic Acid Structures Determined by NMR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  J L Markley; A Bax; Y Arata; C W Hilbers; R Kaptein; B D Sykes; P E Wright; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Parametrisation of time-averaged distance restraints in MD simulations.

Authors:  A P Nanzer; W F van Gunsteren; A E Torda
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  A protein structure from nuclear magnetic resonance data. lac repressor headpiece.

Authors:  R Kaptein; E R Zuiderweg; R M Scheek; R Boelens; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-03-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Pseudo-structures for the 20 common amino acids for use in studies of protein conformations by measurements of intramolecular proton-proton distance constraints with nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  K Wüthrich; M Billeter; W Braun
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  7 in total

1.  An improved structural characterisation of reduced French bean plastocyanin based on NMR data and local-elevation molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Denise Steiner; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Methods of NMR structure refinement: molecular dynamics simulations improve the agreement with measured NMR data of a C-terminal peptide of GCN4-p1.

Authors:  Jozica Dolenc; John H Missimer; Michel O Steinmetz; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Biomolecular structure refinement using the GROMOS simulation software.

Authors:  Nathan Schmid; Jane R Allison; Jožica Dolenc; Andreas P Eichenberger; Anna-Pitschna E Kunz; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Time-averaged order parameter restraints in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Niels Hansen; Fabian Heller; Nathan Schmid; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Assessing and refining molecular dynamics simulations of proteins with nuclear magnetic resonance data.

Authors:  Jane R Allison
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2012-09-01

6.  Paradynamics: an effective and reliable model for ab initio QM/MM free-energy calculations and related tasks.

Authors:  Nikolay V Plotnikov; Shina C L Kamerlin; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  On the use of time-averaging restraints when deriving biomolecular structure from ³J -coupling values obtained from NMR experiments.

Authors:  Lorna J Smith; Wilfred F van Gunsteren; Niels Hansen
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.835

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.