Literature DB >> 21618985

Paradynamics: an effective and reliable model for ab initio QM/MM free-energy calculations and related tasks.

Nikolay V Plotnikov1, Shina C L Kamerlin, Arieh Warshel.   

Abstract

Recent years have seen tremendous effort in the development of approaches with which to obtain quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) free energies for reactions in the condensed phase. Nevertheless, there remain significant challenges to address, particularly, the high computational cost involved in performing proper configurational sampling and, in particular, in obtaining ab initio QM/MM (QM(ai)/MM) free-energy surfaces. One increasingly popular approach that seems to offer an ideal way to progress in this direction is the elegant metadynamics (MTD) approach. However, in the current work, we point out the subtle efficiency problems associated with this approach and illustrate that we have at hand what is arguably a more powerful approach. More specifically, we demonstrate the effectiveness of an updated version of our original idea of using a classical reference potential for QM(ai)/MM calculations [J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17516)], which we refer to as paradynamics (PD). This approach is based on the use of an empirical valence bond (EVB) reference potential, which is already similar to the real ab initio potential. The reference potential is fitted to the ab initio potential by an iterative and, to a great degree, automated refinement procedure. The corresponding free-energy profile is then constructed using the refined EVB potential, and the linear response approximation (LRA) is used to evaluate the QM(ai)/MM activation free-energy barrier. The automated refinement of the EVB surface (and thus the reduction of the difference between the reference and ab initio potentials) is a key factor in accelerating the convergence of the LRA approach. We apply our PD approach to a test reaction, namely, the S(N)2 reaction between a chloride ion and methyl chloride, and demonstrate that, at present, this approach is far more powerful and cost-effective than the metadynamics approach (at least in its current implementation). We also discuss the general features of the PD approach in terms of its ability to explore complex systems and clarify that it is not a specialized approach limited to only accelerating QM(ai)/MM calculations with proper sampling, but rather can be used in a wide variety of applications. In fact, we point out that the use of a reference (CG) potential coupled with its PD refinement, as well as our renormalization approach, provides very general and powerful strategies that can be used very effectively to explore any property that has been studied by the MTD approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21618985      PMCID: PMC3124314          DOI: 10.1021/jp201217b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  36 in total

1.  Simulations of apo and holo-fatty acid binding protein: structure and dynamics of protein, ligand and internal water.

Authors:  Dirk Bakowies; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Accelerating quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical sampling using pure molecular mechanical potential as an importance function: the case of effective fragment potential.

Authors:  Pradipta Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Using the constrained DFT approach in generating diabatic surfaces and off diagonal empirical valence bond terms for modeling reactions in condensed phases.

Authors:  Gongyi Hong; Edina Rosta; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Metadynamics as a tool for exploring free energy landscapes of chemical reactions.

Authors:  Bernd Ensing; Marco De Vivo; Zhiwei Liu; Preston Moore; Michael L Klein
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  An efficient method for the calculation of quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics free energies.

Authors:  Christopher J Woods; Frederick R Manby; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Exploring intramolecular reactions in complex systems with metadynamics: the case of the malonate anions.

Authors:  Eliana Asciutto; Celeste Sagui
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Local elevation: a method for improving the searching properties of molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  T Huber; A E Torda; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Renormalizing SMD: the renormalization approach and its use in long time simulations and accelerated PMF calculations of macromolecules.

Authors:  Anatoly Dryga; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Multiscale simulations of protein landscapes: using coarse-grained models as reference potentials to full explicit models.

Authors:  Benjamin M Messer; Maite Roca; Zhen T Chu; Spyridon Vicatos; Alexandra Vardi Kilshtain; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-04
View more
  35 in total

1.  Enhancing Paradynamics for QM/MM Sampling of Enzymatic Reactions.

Authors:  Jerônimo Lameira; Ilya Kupchencko; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Density functional tight binding: values of semi-empirical methods in an ab initio era.

Authors:  Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.676

3.  Perspective: Quantum mechanical methods in biochemistry and biophysics.

Authors:  Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Comparison of Methods To Reweight from Classical Molecular Simulations to QM/MM Potentials.

Authors:  Eric C Dybeck; Gerhard König; Bernard R Brooks; Michael R Shirts
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Toward Determining ATPase Mechanism in ABC Transporters: Development of the Reaction Path-Force Matching QM/MM Method.

Authors:  Y Zhou; P Ojeda-May; M Nagaraju; J Pu
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Exploring the Effectiveness of Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Dibyendu Mondal; Jacob Florian; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  QM/MM free energy simulations: recent progress and challenges.

Authors:  Xiya Lu; Dong Fang; Shingo Ito; Yuko Okamoto; Victor Ovchinnikov; Qiang Cui
Journal:  Mol Simul       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.178

8.  QM/MM Analysis of Transition States and Transition State Analogues in Metalloenzymes.

Authors:  D Roston; Q Cui
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 9.  Why nature really chose phosphate.

Authors:  Shina C L Kamerlin; Pankaz K Sharma; Ram B Prasad; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.318

10.  Conformational effects on the pro-S hydrogen abstraction reaction in cyclooxygenase-1: an integrated QM/MM and MD study.

Authors:  Christo Z Christov; Alessio Lodola; Tatyana G Karabencheva-Christova; Shunzhou Wan; Peter V Coveney; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.