Literature DB >> 15803330

Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field.

Chris Oostenbrink1, Thereza A Soares, Nico F A van der Vegt, Wilfred F van Gunsteren.   

Abstract

The quality of biomolecular dynamics simulations relies critically on the force field that is used to describe the interactions between particles in the system. Force fields, which are generally parameterized using experimental data on small molecules, can only prove themselves in realistic simulations of relevant biomolecular systems. In this work, we begin the validation of the new 53A6 GROMOS parameter set by examining three test cases. Simulations of the well-studied 129 residue protein hen egg-white lysozyme, of the DNA dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG)(2), and a proteinogenic beta(3)-dodecapeptide were performed and analysed. It was found that the new parameter set performs as well as the previous parameter sets in terms of protein (45A3) and DNA (45A4) stability and that it is better at describing the folding-unfolding balance of the peptide. The latter is a property that is directly associated with the free enthalpy of hydration, to which the 53A6 parameter set was parameterized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15803330     DOI: 10.1007/s00249-004-0448-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Biophys J        ISSN: 0175-7571            Impact factor:   1.733


  47 in total

1.  The Key to Solving the Protein-Folding Problem Lies in an Accurate Description of the Denatured State Financial support from the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds (Project no. 21-50929.97) is gratefully acknowledged.

Authors:  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren; Roland Bürgi; Christine Peter; Xavier Daura
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 2.  Molecular dynamics simulation of nucleic acids.

Authors:  T E Cheatham; P A Kollman
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.703

Review 3.  Unfolded state of peptides.

Authors:  Xavier Daura; Alice Glättli; Peter Gee; Christine Peter; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2002

4.  Calculation of the water-cyclohexane transfer free energies of neutral amino acid side-chain analogs using the OPLS all-atom force field.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; D Peter Tieleman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  The B-DNA dodecamer at high resolution reveals a spine of water on sodium.

Authors:  X Shui; L McFail-Isom; G G Hu; L D Williams
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-06-09       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Pseudo-structures for the 20 common amino acids for use in studies of protein conformations by measurements of intramolecular proton-proton distance constraints with nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  K Wüthrich; M Billeter; W Braun
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  A new GROMOS force field for hexopyranose-based carbohydrates.

Authors:  Roberto D Lins; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Structural determinants of protein dynamics: analysis of 15N NMR relaxation measurements for main-chain and side-chain nuclei of hen egg white lysozyme.

Authors:  M Buck; J Boyd; C Redfield; D A MacKenzie; D J Jeenes; D B Archer; C M Dobson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-03-28       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Refined solution structure and ligand-binding properties of PDC-109 domain b. A collagen-binding type II domain.

Authors:  K L Constantine; M Madrid; L Bányai; M Trexler; L Patthy; M Llinás
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-01-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  115 in total

1.  Structural basis for μ-opioid receptor binding and activation.

Authors:  Adrian W R Serohijos; Shuangye Yin; Feng Ding; Josee Gauthier; Dustin G Gibson; William Maixner; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Luda Diatchenko
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  A comparison of the different helices adopted by α- and β-peptides suggests different reasons for their stability.

Authors:  Jane R Allison; Marlen Müller; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Methods of NMR structure refinement: molecular dynamics simulations improve the agreement with measured NMR data of a C-terminal peptide of GCN4-p1.

Authors:  Jozica Dolenc; John H Missimer; Michel O Steinmetz; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Exploring the trigger sequence of the GCN4 coiled-coil: biased molecular dynamics resolves apparent inconsistencies in NMR measurements.

Authors:  John H Missimer; Jožica Dolenc; Michel O Steinmetz; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  AMOEBA+ Classical Potential for Modeling Molecular Interactions.

Authors:  Chengwen Liu; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  The Design of a Next Generation Force Field: The X-POL Potential.

Authors:  Wangshen Xie; Jiali Gao
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 7.  Classical electrostatics for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  G Andrés Cisneros; Mikko Karttunen; Pengyu Ren; Celeste Sagui
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Molecular modeling and dynamics studies of purine nucleoside phosphorylase from Bacteroides fragilis.

Authors:  Ivani Pauli; Luis Fernando Saraiva Macedo Timmers; Rafael Andrade Caceres; Luiz Augusto Basso; Diógenes Santiago Santos; Walter Filgueira de Azevedo
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 9.  Molecular dynamics simulations in photosynthesis.

Authors:  Nicoletta Liguori; Roberta Croce; Siewert J Marrink; Sebastian Thallmair
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Small Molecule Inhibitor that Stabilizes the Autoinhibited Conformation of the Oncogenic Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP2.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Wu; Gang Xu; Xiaobo Li; Weiren Xu; Qianjin Li; Wei Liu; Karen A Kirby; Mignon L Loh; Jun Li; Stefan G Sarafianos; Cheng-Kui Qu
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.