Literature DB >> 20524044

Methods of NMR structure refinement: molecular dynamics simulations improve the agreement with measured NMR data of a C-terminal peptide of GCN4-p1.

Jozica Dolenc1, John H Missimer, Michel O Steinmetz, Wilfred F van Gunsteren.   

Abstract

The C-terminal trigger sequence is essential in the coiled-coil formation of GCN4-p1; its conformational properties are thus of importance for understanding this process at the atomic level. A solution NMR model structure of a peptide, GCN4p16-31, encompassing the GCN4-p1 trigger sequence was proposed a few years ago. Derived using a standard single-structure refinement protocol based on 172 nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) distance restraints, 14 hydrogen-bond and 11 phi torsional-angle restraints, the resulting set of 20 NMR model structures exhibits regular alpha-helical structure. However, the set slightly violates some measured NOE bounds and does not reproduce all 15 measured (3)J(H(N)-H(Calpha))-coupling constants, indicating that different conformers of GCN4p16-31 might be present in solution. With the aim to resolve structures compatible with all NOE upper distance bounds and (3)J-coupling constants, we executed several structure refinement protocols employing unrestrained and restrained molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with two force fields. We find that only configurational ensembles obtained by applying simultaneously time-averaged NOE distance and (3)J-coupling constant restraining with either force field reproduce all the experimental data. Additionally, analyses of the simulated ensembles show that the conformational variability of GCN4p16-31 in solution admitted by the available set of 187 measured NMR data is larger than represented by the set of the NMR model structures. The conformations of GCN4p16-31 in solution differ in the orientation not only of the side-chains but also of the backbone. The inconsistencies between the NMR model structures and the measured NMR data are due to the neglect of averaging effects and the inclusion of hydrogen-bond and torsional-angle restraints that have little basis in the primary, i.e. measured NMR data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20524044     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-010-9425-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  45 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The effect of motional averaging on the calculation of NMR-derived structural properties.

Authors:  X Daura; I Antes; W F van Gunsteren; W Thiel; A E Mark
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-09-01

3.  The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package.

Authors:  Charles D Schwieters; John J Kuszewski; Nico Tjandra; G Marius Clore
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Molecular dynamics simulation using weak-coupling NOE distance restraining.

Authors:  A P Nanzer; T Huber; A E Torda; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Philippe H Hünenberger; Dirk Bakowies; Riccardo Baron; Roland Bürgi; Daan P Geerke; Tim N Heinz; Mika A Kastenholz; Vincent Kräutler; Chris Oostenbrink; Christine Peter; Daniel Trzesniak; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Thereza A Soares; Nico F A van der Vegt; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.733

7.  Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: how much can NOEs actually tell us?

Authors:  Bojan Zagrovic; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-04-01

Review 8.  Molecular simulation as an aid to experimentalists.

Authors:  Wilfred F van Gunsteren; Jozica Dolenc; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Parametrisation of time-averaged distance restraints in MD simulations.

Authors:  A P Nanzer; W F van Gunsteren; A E Torda
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  A protein structure from nuclear magnetic resonance data. lac repressor headpiece.

Authors:  R Kaptein; E R Zuiderweg; R M Scheek; R Boelens; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-03-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  11 in total

1.  Exploring the trigger sequence of the GCN4 coiled-coil: biased molecular dynamics resolves apparent inconsistencies in NMR measurements.

Authors:  John H Missimer; Jožica Dolenc; Michel O Steinmetz; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Conformationally constrained peptides from CD2 to modulate protein-protein interactions between CD2 and CD58.

Authors:  Ameya Gokhale; Thomas K Weldeghiorghis; Veena Taneja; Seetharama D Satyanarayanajois
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7.

Authors:  Nathan Schmid; Andreas P Eichenberger; Alexandra Choutko; Sereina Riniker; Moritz Winger; Alan E Mark; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Biomolecular structure refinement using the GROMOS simulation software.

Authors:  Nathan Schmid; Jane R Allison; Jožica Dolenc; Andreas P Eichenberger; Anna-Pitschna E Kunz; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Time-averaged order parameter restraints in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Niels Hansen; Fabian Heller; Nathan Schmid; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 6.  Assessing and refining molecular dynamics simulations of proteins with nuclear magnetic resonance data.

Authors:  Jane R Allison
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2012-09-01

7.  Modulation of co-stimulatory signal from CD2-CD58 proteins by a grafted peptide.

Authors:  Pravin Parajuli; Rushikesh Sable; Leeza Shrestha; Achyut Dahal; Ted Gauthier; Veena Taneja; Seetharama Jois
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.817

8.  Testing of the GROMOS Force-Field Parameter Set 54A8: Structural Properties of Electrolyte Solutions, Lipid Bilayers, and Proteins.

Authors:  Maria M Reif; Moritz Winger; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Molecular dynamics re-refinement of two different small RNA loop structures using the original NMR data suggest a common structure.

Authors:  Niel M Henriksen; Darrell R Davis; Thomas E Cheatham
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Algal Toxin Goniodomin A Binds Potassium Ion Selectively to Yield a Conformationally Altered Complex with Potential Biological Consequences.

Authors:  Craig J Tainter; Nathan D Schley; Constance M Harris; Donald F Stec; Anna K Song; Andrzej Balinski; Jody C May; John A McLean; Kimberly S Reece; Thomas M Harris
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.803

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.