Literature DB >> 23665823

Prognostic value of dual-source multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stent implantation.

Hamza Sunman1, Hikmet Yorgun, Uğur Canpolat, Ayşegül Ülgen Kunak, Muhammet Dural, Tuncay Hazırolan, Levent Sahiner, Ergün Barış Kaya, Kudret Aytemir, Lale Tokgözoğlu, Giray Kabakçı, Ali Oto.   

Abstract

We aim to evaluate the prognostic value of dual-source 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with coronary stents. The study included 173 patients [mean age 59.9 ± 10.1 years, 76.7 % male] with previous stent implantation who underwent MDCT for evaluation of CAD and stent patency. Coronary imaging was performed via dual-source MDCT scanner. Stented vessel segment was evaluated as patent without neointimal hyperplasia (NIH), nonobstructive NIH (<50 % luminal narrowing), or obstructive NIH (>50 % luminal narrowing). Patients were evaluated for major cardiovascular events (MACEs) to demonstrate association between stent patency and clinical outcome. MACEs that were originating from non-stented segments were excluded. A total of 213 coronary stents were evaluated in our study. During mean of 21.2 ± 13.6 months' follow-up, 25 patients experienced MACEs [1 (4.0 %) cardiac death, 5 (20.0 %) nonfatal MI, and 19 (76.0 %) unstable angina pectoris requiring hospitalization and target vessel revascularization] associated with stented segment of coronary arteries. One hundred of 105 patients (95.2 %) with a patent stent without NIH detected by MDCT had no cardiac event associated with stented segments during mean 2 years' follow-up period. These data indicate that patients with a patent stent without NIH as determined by MDCT have a good prognosis as opposed to an increased rate of events among patients with either nonobstructive or obstructive NIH as determined with MDCT, supporting MDCT as a reliable tool to evaluate patients after coronary stenting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23665823     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0236-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  21 in total

1.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Acute and chronic tissue response to coronary stent implantation: pathologic findings in human specimen.

Authors:  P H Grewe; T Deneke; A Machraoui; J Barmeyer; K M Müller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography--initial experience.

Authors:  Dilek Oncel; Guray Oncel; Mustafa Karaca
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Joanne D Schuijf; Francesca Pugliese; Nico R Mollet; J Wouter Jukema; Erica Maffei; Lucia J Kroft; Alessandro Palumbo; Diego Ardissino; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Ernst E Van der Wall; Pim J de Feyter; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography.

Authors:  Iacopo Carbone; Marco Francone; Emanuela Algeri; Antonino Granatelli; Alessandro Napoli; Miles A Kirchin; Carlo Catalano; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Joanne D Schuijf; Jeroen J Bax; J Wouter Jukema; Hildo J Lamb; Hazem M A Warda; Hubert W Vliegen; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  The "post-64" era of coronary CT angiography: understanding new technology from physical principles.

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Michael L Steigner; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Piet K Vanhoenacker; Isabel Decramer; Olivier Bladt; Giovanna Sarno; Erik Van Hul; William Wijns; Ben A Dwamena
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of age and plaque morphology on diagnostic accuracy of dual source multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Hamza Sunman; Kudret Aytemir; Hikmet Yorgun; Uğur Canpolat; Ali Taher; Edis Demiri; Tuncay Hazırolan; Levent Sahiner; Ergün B Kaya; Giray Kabakçı; Lale Tokgözoğlu; Ali Oto
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.327

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.