Literature DB >> 17924201

Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). II. The genome homology of two mole voles (genus Ellobius), the field vole and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Svetlana A Romanenko1, Natalia A Sitnikova, Natalya A Serdukova, Polina L Perelman, Nadezhda V Rubtsova, Irina Yu Bakloushinskaya, Elena A Lyapunova, Walter Just, Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith, Fengtang Yang, Alexander S Graphodatsky.   

Abstract

Using cross-species chromosome painting, we have carried out a comprehensive comparison of the karyotypes of two Ellobius species with unusual sex determination systems: the Transcaucasian mole vole, Ellobius lutescens (2n = 17, X in both sexes), and the northern mole vole, Ellobius talpinus (2n = 54, XX in both sexes). Both Ellobius species have highly rearranged karyotypes. The chromosomal paints from the field vole (Microtus agrestis) detected, in total, 34 and 32 homologous autosomal regions in E. lutescens and E. talpinus karyotypes, respectively. No difference in hybridization pattern of the X paint (as well as Y paint) probes on male and female chromosomes was discovered. The set of golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) chromosomal painting probes revealed 44 and 43 homologous autosomal regions in E. lutescens and E. talpinus karyotypes, respectively. A comparative chromosome map was established based on the results of cross-species chromosome painting and a hypothetical ancestral Ellobius karyotype was reconstructed. A considerable number of rearrangements were detected; 31 and 7 fusion/fission rearrangements differentiated the karyotypes of E. lutescens and E. talpinus from the ancestral Ellobius karyotype. It seems that inversions have played a minor role in the genome evolution of these Ellobius species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17924201     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-007-1171-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  13 in total

1.  Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting.

Authors:  F Yang; P C O'Brien; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  A comparative chromosome map of the Arctic fox, red fox and dog defined by chromosome painting and high resolution G-banding.

Authors:  A S Graphodatsky; F Yang; P C O'Brien; N Serdukova; B S Milne; V Trifonov; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  [Karyotype evolution in the genus Ellobius (Microtinae, Rodentia)].

Authors:  Iu M Borisov; E A Liapunova; N N Borontsov
Journal:  Genetika       Date:  1991-03

4.  Absence of Sry in species of the vole Ellobius.

Authors:  W Just; W Rau; W Vogel; M Akhverdian; K Fredga; J A Graves; E Lyapunova
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  The sex determination in Ellobius lutescens remains bizarre.

Authors:  W Just; A Baumstark; H Hameister; B Schreiner; I Reisert; M Hakhverdyan; W Vogel
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  [Chromosome complement and cytogenetic differentiation of 2 forms of Ellobius talpinus Pall].

Authors:  N N Vorontsov; S I Radjabli
Journal:  Tsitologiia       Date:  1967-07

7.  Chromosomal mechanisms underlying the karyotype evolution of the oriental voles (Muridae, Eothenomys).

Authors:  T Li; J Wang; W Su; F Yang
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.636

8.  Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  Natalia A Sitnikova; Svetlana A Romanenko; Patricia C M O'Brien; Polina L Perelman; Beiyuan Fu; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Natalya A Serdukova; Feodor N Golenishchev; Vladimir A Trifonov; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Chromosome painting in the long-tailed field mouse provides insights into the ancestral murid karyotype.

Authors:  R Stanyon; F Yang; A M Morescalchi; L Galleni
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

10.  Reciprocal chromosome painting between three laboratory rodent species.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Polina L Perelman; Natalya A Serdukova; Vladimir A Trifonov; Larisa S Biltueva; Jinhuan Wang; Tangliang Li; Wenhui Nie; Patricia C M O'Brien; Vitaly T Volobouev; Roscoe Stanyon; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.224

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal evolution in Rodentia.

Authors:  S A Romanenko; P L Perelman; V A Trifonov; A S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Sox9 gene regulation and the loss of the XY/XX sex-determining mechanism in the mole vole Ellobius lutescens.

Authors:  Stefan Bagheri-Fam; Rajini Sreenivasan; Pascal Bernard; Kevin C Knower; Ryohei Sekido; Robin Lovell-Badge; Walter Just; Vincent R Harley
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). III. Karyotype relationships of ten Microtus species.

Authors:  Natalia A Lemskaya; Svetlana A Romanenko; Feodor N Golenishchev; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Olga V Sablina; Natalya A Serdukova; Patricia C M O'Brien; Beiyuan Fu; Nuri Yiğit; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Reconstruction of karyotype evolution in core Glires. I. The genome homology revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  Violetta R Beklemisheva; Svetlana A Romanenko; Larisa S Biltueva; Vladimir A Trifonov; Nadezhda V Vorobieva; Natalya A Serdukova; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Oleg V Brandler; Patricia C M O'Brien; Fentang Yang; Roscoe Stanyon; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  The genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals.

Authors:  Alexander S Graphodatsky; Vladimir A Trifonov; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  New insights into the karyotypic evolution in muroid rodents revealed by multicolor banding applying murine probes.

Authors:  Vladimir A Trifonov; Nadezda Kosyakova; Svetlana A Romanenko; Roscoe Stanyon; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.

Authors:  Raquel Chaves; Sandra Louzada; Susana Meles; Johannes Wienberg; Filomena Adega
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Genome-wide comparative chromosome maps of Arvicola amphibius, Dicrostonyx torquatus, and Myodes rutilus.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Natalya A Lemskaya; Vladimir A Trifonov; Natalya A Serdyukova; Patricia C M O'Brien; Nina Sh Bulatova; Feodor N Golenishchev; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Chromosomal phylogeny of four Akodontini species (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from southern Brazil established by Zoo-FISH using Mus musculus (Muridae) painting probes.

Authors:  Iris Hass; Ives José Sbalqueiro; Stefan Müller
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  A genetic linkage map and comparative mapping of the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) genome.

Authors:  Lisa A McGraw; Jamie K Davis; Larry J Young; James W Thomas
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.