Literature DB >> 17143584

Reciprocal chromosome painting between three laboratory rodent species.

Svetlana A Romanenko1, Polina L Perelman, Natalya A Serdukova, Vladimir A Trifonov, Larisa S Biltueva, Jinhuan Wang, Tangliang Li, Wenhui Nie, Patricia C M O'Brien, Vitaly T Volobouev, Roscoe Stanyon, Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith, Fengtang Yang, Alexander S Graphodatsky.   

Abstract

The laboratory mouse (Mus musculus, 2n = 40), the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus, 2n = 22), and the golden (Syrian) hamster (Mesocricetus auratus, 2n = 44) are common laboratory animals, extensively used in biomedical research. In contrast with the mouse genome, which was sequenced and well characterized, the hamster species has been set aside. We constructed a chromosome paint set for the golden hamster, which for the first time allowed us to perform multidirectional chromosome painting between the golden hamster and the mouse and between the two species of hamster. From these data we constructed a detailed comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and the two hamster species. The golden hamster painting probes revealed 25 autosomal segments in the Chinese hamster and 43 in the mouse. Using the Chinese hamster probes, 23 conserved segments were found in the golden hamster karyotype. The mouse probes revealed 42 conserved autosomal segments in the golden hamster karyotype. The two largest chromosomes of the Chinese hamster (1 and 2) are homologous to seven and five chromosomes of the golden hamster, respectively. The golden hamster karyotype can be transformed into the Chinese hamster karyotype by 15 fusions and 3 fissions. Previous reconstructions of the ancestral murid karyotype proposed diploid numbers from 2n = 52 to 2n = 54. By integrating the new multidirectional chromosome painting data presented here with previous comparative genomics data, we can propose that syntenies to mouse Chrs 6 and 16 were both present and to hypothesize a diploid number of 2n = 48 for the ancestral Murinae/Cricetinae karyotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17143584     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-006-0081-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   3.224


  27 in total

1.  Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting.

Authors:  F Yang; P C O'Brien; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Phylogenetic implications of the 38 putative ancestral chromosome segments for four canid species.

Authors:  A S Graphodatsky; F Yang; P C O'Brien; P Perelman; B S Milne; N Serdukova; S I Kawada; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Genetic analysis by chromosome sorting and painting: phylogenetic and diagnostic applications.

Authors:  M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Identification of Syrian hamster chromosomes by acetic-saline-Giemsa (ASG) and trypsin techniques.

Authors:  N C Popescu; J A DiPaolo
Journal:  Cytogenetics       Date:  1972

5.  A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes.

Authors:  M Seabright
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Further insights into the ancestral murine karyotype: the contribution of the Otomys-Mus comparison using chromosome painting.

Authors:  A Engelbrecht; G Dobigny; T J Robinson
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Mus and Peromyscus chromosome homology established by FISH with three mouse paint probes.

Authors:  W D Dawson; S R Young; Z Wang; L W Liu; I F Greenbaum; L M Davis; B K Hall
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes.

Authors:  H Telenius; A H Pelmear; A Tunnacliffe; N P Carter; A Behmel; M A Ferguson-Smith; M Nordenskjöld; R Pfragner; B A Ponder
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Phylogeny and divergence-date estimates of rapid radiations in muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes.

Authors:  Scott Steppan; Ronald Adkins; Joel Anderson
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  Chromosome painting in the long-tailed field mouse provides insights into the ancestral murid karyotype.

Authors:  R Stanyon; F Yang; A M Morescalchi; L Galleni
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal evolution in Rodentia.

Authors:  S A Romanenko; P L Perelman; V A Trifonov; A S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Divergent patterns of breakpoint reuse in Muroid rodents.

Authors:  E E Mlynarski; C J Obergfell; M J O'Neill; R J O'Neill
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Reconstruction of karyotype evolution in core Glires. I. The genome homology revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  Violetta R Beklemisheva; Svetlana A Romanenko; Larisa S Biltueva; Vladimir A Trifonov; Nadezhda V Vorobieva; Natalya A Serdukova; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Oleg V Brandler; Patricia C M O'Brien; Fentang Yang; Roscoe Stanyon; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Karyotype evolution and phylogenetic relationships of hamsters (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia) inferred from chromosomal painting and banding comparison.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Vitaly T Volobouev; Polina L Perelman; Vladimir S Lebedev; Natalya A Serdukova; Vladimir A Trifonov; Larisa S Biltueva; Wenhui Nie; Patricia C M O'Brien; Nina Sh Bulatova; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.

Authors:  Raquel Chaves; Sandra Louzada; Susana Meles; Johannes Wienberg; Filomena Adega
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Karyotype diversity suggests that Laonastes aenigmamus (Laotian rock rat) (Rodentia, Diatomyidae) is a multi-specific genus.

Authors:  Florence Richard; Michèle Gerbault-Seureau; Bounneuang Douangboupha; Kham Keovichit; Jean-Pierre Hugot; Bernard Dutrillaux
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Genome-wide comparative chromosome maps of Arvicola amphibius, Dicrostonyx torquatus, and Myodes rutilus.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Natalya A Lemskaya; Vladimir A Trifonov; Natalya A Serdyukova; Patricia C M O'Brien; Nina Sh Bulatova; Feodor N Golenishchev; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Chromosomal phylogeny of four Akodontini species (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from southern Brazil established by Zoo-FISH using Mus musculus (Muridae) painting probes.

Authors:  Iris Hass; Ives José Sbalqueiro; Stefan Müller
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  Natalia A Sitnikova; Svetlana A Romanenko; Patricia C M O'Brien; Polina L Perelman; Beiyuan Fu; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Natalya A Serdukova; Feodor N Golenishchev; Vladimir A Trifonov; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). II. The genome homology of two mole voles (genus Ellobius), the field vole and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Natalia A Sitnikova; Natalya A Serdukova; Polina L Perelman; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Irina Yu Bakloushinskaya; Elena A Lyapunova; Walter Just; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.