Literature DB >> 17912574

Does thoracic or lumbar spine bone architecture predict vertebral failure strength more accurately than density?

E-M Lochmüller1, K Pöschl, L Würstlin, M Matsuura, R Müller, T M Link, F Eckstein.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Trabecular bone microstructure was studied in 6 mm bone biopsies taken from the 10th thoracic and 2nd lumbar vertebra of 165 human donors and shown to not differ significantly between these sites. Microstructural parameters at the locations examined provided only marginal additional information to quantitative computed tomography in predicting experimental failure strength.
INTRODUCTION: It is unknown whether trabecular microstructure differs between thoracic and lumbar vertebrae and whether it adds significant information in predicting the mechanical strength of vertebrae in combination with QCT-based bone density.
METHODS: Six mm cylindrical biopsies taken at mid-vertebral level, anterior to the center of the thoracic vertebra (T) 10 and the lumbar vertebra (L) 2 were studied with micro-computed tomography (microCT) in 165 donors (age 52 to 99 years). The segment T11-L1 was examined with QCT and tested to failure using a testing machine.
RESULTS: The correlation of microstructural properties was moderate between T10 and L2 (r <or= 0.5). No significant differences were observed in the microstructural properties between the thoracic and lumbar spine, nor were sex differences at T10 or L2 observed. Cortical/subcortical density of T12 (r(2)=48%) was more strongly correlated with vertebral failure stress than trabecular density (r(2)=32%). BV/TV (of T10) improved the prediction by 52% (adjusted r(2)) in a multiple regression model.
CONCLUSION: Microstructural properties of trabecular bone biopsies displayed a high degree of heterogeneity between vertebrae but did not differ significantly between the thoracic and lumbar spine. At the locations examined, bone microstructure only marginally improved the prediction of structural vertebral strength beyond QCT-based bone density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17912574     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0478-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  44 in total

1.  [The texture-analysis of high-resolution computed tomograms as an additional procedure in osteoporosis diagnosis: in-vitro studies on vertebral segments].

Authors:  S Waldt; N Meier; B Renger; H Lenzen; M Fiebich; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1999-08

2.  Relationship between CT intensity, micro-architecture and mechanical properties of porcine vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Jeremy C M Teo; Kuan Ming Si-Hoe; Justin E L Keh; Swee Hin Teoh
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Spinal compression fractures in osteoporotic women: patterns and relationship to hyperkyphosis.

Authors:  A A De Smet; R G Robinson; B E Johnson; B P Lukert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Multi-detector row CT imaging of vertebral microstructure for evaluation of fracture risk.

Authors:  Masako Ito; Kyoji Ikeda; Masahiko Nishiguchi; Hiroyuki Shindo; Masataka Uetani; Takayuki Hosoi; Hajime Orimo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  The effect of vertebral fracture as a risk factor for osteoporotic fracture and mortality in a Spanish population.

Authors:  M Naves; J B Díaz-López; C Gómez; A Rodríguez-Rebollar; M Rodríguez-García; J B Cannata-Andía
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Prevalent vertebral deformities predict increased mortality and increased fracture rate in both men and women: a 10-year population-based study of 598 individuals from the Swedish cohort in the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  R Hasserius; M K Karlsson; B E Nilsson; I Redlund-Johnell; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads.

Authors:  J Homminga; B Van-Rietbergen; E M Lochmüller; H Weinans; F Eckstein; R Huiskes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Incident vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study.

Authors:  D M Kado; T Duong; K L Stone; K E Ensrud; M C Nevitt; G A Greendale; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Thoracic spine compression fractures in Finland.

Authors:  M Härmä; M Heliövaara; A Aromaa; P Knekt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  13 in total

1.  Role of trabecular microarchitecture in whole-vertebral body biomechanical behavior.

Authors:  Aaron J Fields; Senthil K Eswaran; Michael G Jekir; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Effect of specimen-specific anisotropic material properties in quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis of the vertebra.

Authors:  Ginu U Unnikrishnan; Glenn D Barest; David B Berry; Amira I Hussein; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Locally measured microstructural parameters are better associated with vertebral strength than whole bone density.

Authors:  J Hazrati Marangalou; F Eckstein; V Kuhn; K Ito; M Cataldi; F Taddei; B van Rietbergen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Association of vertebral endplate microstructure with bone strength in men and women.

Authors:  MeiLissa McKay; Timothy M Jackman; Amira I Hussein; Ali Guermazi; Jingjiang Liu; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  The role of patient-mode high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography indices in the prediction of failure strength of the elderly women's thoracic vertebral body.

Authors:  Y Lu; M Krause; N Bishop; K Sellenschloh; C-C Glüer; K Püschel; M Amling; M M Morlock; G Huber
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Radiographic trabecular 2D and 3D parameters of proximal femoral bone cores correlate with each other and with yield stress.

Authors:  D Steines; S-W Liew; C Arnaud; R Vargas-Voracek; A Nazarian; R Müller; B Snyder; P Hess; P Lang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Effect of fabric on the accuracy of computed tomography-based finite element analyses of the vertebra.

Authors:  Yuanqiao Wu; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2019-09-10

Review 8.  High-resolution computed tomography for clinical imaging of bone microarchitecture.

Authors:  Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Pathophysiology and biomechanics of the aging spine.

Authors:  Michael Papadakis; Georgios Sapkas; Elias C Papadopoulos; Pavlos Katonis
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-09-19

10.  Early Trabecular Development in Human Vertebrae: Overproduction, Constructive Regression, and Refinement.

Authors:  Frank Acquaah; Katharine A Robson Brown; Farah Ahmed; Nathan Jeffery; Richard L Abel
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.