Literature DB >> 25135580

The role of patient-mode high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography indices in the prediction of failure strength of the elderly women's thoracic vertebral body.

Y Lu1, M Krause, N Bishop, K Sellenschloh, C-C Glüer, K Püschel, M Amling, M M Morlock, G Huber.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The correlations between the failure load of 20 T12 vertebral bodies, their <span class="Species">patient-mode high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) indices, and the L1 areal bone mineral density (aBMD) were investigated. For the prediction of the T12 <span class="Disease">vertebral failure load, the T12 HR-pQCT microarchitectural parameters added significant information to that of L1 aBMD and to that of cortical BMD, but not to that of T12 vertebral BMD and not to that of T12 trabecular BMD.
INTRODUCTION: HR-pQCT is a new in vivo imaging technique for assessing the three-dimensional microarchitecture of cortical and trabecular bone at the distal radius and tibia. But little is known about this technique in the direct measurement of vertebral body.
METHODS: Twenty female donors with the mean age of 80.1 (7.6) years were included in the study. Dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine and femur was performed. The spinal specimens (T11/T12/L1) were dissected, scanned using HR-pQCT scanner, and mechanically tested under 4° wedge compression. The L1 aBMD, T12 patient-mode HR-pQCT indices, and T12 vertebral failure loads were analyzed.
RESULTS: For the prediction of vertebral failure load, the inclusion of BV/TV into L1 aBMD was the best model (R (2) = 0.52), Tb.N and Tb.Sp added significant information to the L1 aBMD and to the cortical BMD, but none of the vertebral microarchitectural parameters yielded additional significant information to the trabecular BMD (or BV/TV) and to the vertebral BMD.
CONCLUSION: Vertebral microarchitectural parameters obtained from the patient-mode HR-pQCT analysis provide significant information on bone strength complementary to that of aBMD and to that of cortical BMD, but not to that of vertebral BMD and not to that of trabecular BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25135580     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2846-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  43 in total

Review 1.  Painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Pathogenesis, evaluation, and roles of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in its management.

Authors:  Raj D Rao; Manoj D Singrakhia
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing.

Authors:  E N Ebbesen; J S Thomsen; H Beck-Nielsen; H J Nepper-Rasmussen; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Locally measured microstructural parameters are better associated with vertebral strength than whole bone density.

Authors:  J Hazrati Marangalou; F Eckstein; V Kuhn; K Ito; M Cataldi; F Taddei; B van Rietbergen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  A calibration methodology of QCT BMD for human vertebral body with registered micro-CT images.

Authors:  E Dall'Ara; P Varga; D Pahr; P Zysset
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Accuracy of trabecular structure by HR-pQCT compared to gold standard μCT in the radius and tibia of patients with osteoporosis and long-term bisphosphonate therapy.

Authors:  M Krause; O Museyko; S Breer; B Wulff; C Duckstein; E Vettorazzi; C Glueer; K Püschel; K Engelke; M Amling
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Lips; C Cooper; D Agnusdei; F Caulin; P Egger; O Johnell; J A Kanis; S Kellingray; A Leplege; U A Liberman; E McCloskey; H Minne; J Reeve; J Y Reginster; M Scholz; C Todd; M C de Vernejoul; I Wiklund
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Adjacent level load transfer following vertebral augmentation in the cadaveric spine.

Authors:  Mark Makumbi Kayanja; Korboi Evans; Ryan Milks; Isador Harry Lieberman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Osteoporosis management in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  E S Christenson; X Jiang; R Kagan; P Schnatz
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2012-06

9.  Influence of non-traumatic thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures on sagittal spine alignment assessed by radiation-free spinometry.

Authors:  M Krause; S Breer; B Mohrmann; E Vettorazzi; R P Marshall; M Amling; F Barvencik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Relative strength of thoracic vertebrae in axial compression versus flexion.

Authors:  Jenni M Buckley; Calvin C Kuo; Liu C Cheng; Kenneth Loo; Julie Motherway; Craig Slyfield; Vedat Deviren; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Designing anisotropic porous bone scaffolds using a self-learning convolutional neural network model.

Authors:  Yongtao Lu; Tingxiang Gong; Zhuoyue Yang; Hanxing Zhu; Yadong Liu; Chengwei Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.