Literature DB >> 19338454

Role of trabecular microarchitecture in whole-vertebral body biomechanical behavior.

Aaron J Fields1, Senthil K Eswaran, Michael G Jekir, Tony M Keaveny.   

Abstract

The role of trabecular microarchitecture in whole-vertebral biomechanical behavior remains unclear, and its influence may be obscured by such factors as overall bone mass, bone geometry, and the presence of the cortical shell. To address this issue, 22 human T(9) vertebral bodies (11 female; 11 male; age range: 53-97 yr, 81.5 +/- 9.6 yr) were scanned with microCT and analyzed for measures of trabecular microarchitecture, BMC, cross-sectional area, and cortical thickness. Sixteen of the vertebrae were biomechanically tested to measure compressive strength. To estimate vertebral compressive stiffness with and without the cortical shell for all 22 vertebrae, two high-resolution finite element models per specimen-one intact model and one with the shell removed-were created from the microCT scans and virtually compressed. Results indicated that BMC and the structural model index (SMI) were the individual parameters most highly associated with strength (R(2) = 0.57 each). Adding microarchitecture variables to BMC in a stepwise multiple regression model improved this association (R(2) = 0.85). However, the microarchitecture variables in that regression model (degree of anisotropy, bone volume fraction) differed from those when BMC was not included in the model (SMI, mean trabecular thickness), and the association was slightly weaker for the latter (R(2) = 0.76). The finite element results indicated that the physical presence of the cortical shell did not alter the relationships between microarchitecture and vertebral stiffness. We conclude that trabecular microarchitecture is associated with whole-vertebral biomechanical behavior and that the role of microarchitecture is mediated by BMC but not by the cortical shell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19338454      PMCID: PMC2730926          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.090317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  50 in total

1.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Christopher E Cann; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing.

Authors:  E N Ebbesen; J S Thomsen; H Beck-Nielsen; H J Nepper-Rasmussen; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Mechanical and morphological variation of the human lumbar vertebral cortical and trabecular bone.

Authors:  M E Roy; J Y Rho; T Y Tsui; N D Evans; G M Pharr
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-02

4.  The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  S D Rockoff; E Sweet; J Bleustein
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1969

5.  Relationship between axial and bending behaviors of the human thoracolumbar vertebra.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Role of trabecular morphology in the etiology of age-related vertebral fractures.

Authors:  B D Snyder; S Piazza; W T Edwards; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads.

Authors:  J Homminga; B Van-Rietbergen; E M Lochmüller; H Weinans; F Eckstein; R Huiskes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; F O Kolb; B Ettinger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Contribution of the cortical shell of vertebrae to mechanical behaviour of the lumbar vertebrae with implications for predicting fracture risk.

Authors:  R Andresen; H J Werner; H C Schober
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  L Joseph Melton; B Lawrence Riggs; Tony M Keaveny; Sara J Achenbach; Paul F Hoffmann; Jon J Camp; Peggy A Rouleau; Mary L Bouxsein; Shreyasee Amin; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Richard A Robb; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Whole bone mechanics and bone quality.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Cole; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Vertebral body bone strength: the contribution of individual trabecular element morphology.

Authors:  I H Parkinson; A Badiei; M Stauber; J Codrington; R Müller; N L Fazzalari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Effects of a perfusion bioreactor activated novel bone substitute in spine fusion in sheep.

Authors:  Jesper Roed Sørensen; Kariatta Ester Koroma; Ming Ding; David Wendt; Stig Jespersen; Maria Vinther Juhl; Naseem Theilgaard; Ivan Martin; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  7T MRI of distal radius trabecular bone microarchitecture: How trabecular bone quality varies depending on distance from end-of-bone.

Authors:  Lindsay M Griffin; Stephen Honig; Cheng Chen; Punam K Saha; Ravinder Regatte; Gregory Chang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Effect of specimen-specific anisotropic material properties in quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis of the vertebra.

Authors:  Ginu U Unnikrishnan; Glenn D Barest; David B Berry; Amira I Hussein; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Structural parameters of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone are affected differently by microCT image resolution.

Authors:  H Isaksson; J Töyräs; M Hakulinen; A S Aula; I Tamminen; P Julkunen; H Kröger; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Vertebral fragility and structural redundancy.

Authors:  Aaron J Fields; Shashank Nawathe; Senthil K Eswaran; Michael G Jekir; Mark F Adams; Panayiotis Papadopoulos; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Model-Independent 3D Descriptors of Vertebral Cancellous Bone Architecture.

Authors:  Ian H Parkinson; Danielle Forbes; Peter Sutton-Smith; Nicola L Fazzalari
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2009-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.