Literature DB >> 10506888

[The texture-analysis of high-resolution computed tomograms as an additional procedure in osteoporosis diagnosis: in-vitro studies on vertebral segments].

S Waldt1, N Meier, B Renger, H Lenzen, M Fiebich, E J Rummeny, T M Link.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform texture analysis of high-resolution CT images obtained from human vertebral specimens and to correlate these parameters with the biomechanical stability of the specimens. In addition, structure data were compared with bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by quantitative CT (QCT).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: High-resolution CT images and standard QCT sections were obtained in 36 vertebral motion segments, each consisting of two vertebrae with intact ligaments and intervertebral disc. The trabecular structure in the CT images was assessed using three texture analysis techniques: Trabecular threshold area ratio (TTAR), fractal dimension without thresholding (OTS) and fractal dimension with thresholding (ITS). Finally, the maximum compressive strength (MCS) was determined using a biomechanical testing device.
RESULTS: A correlation of r = 0.76 (p < 0.01) was obtained for TTAR versus MCS, of r = 0.83 (p < 0.01) for ITS versus MCS, and of r = 0.35 (p > 0.01) for OTS versus MCS, while r = 0.76 (p < 0.01) was found for BMD versus MCS. Best results were obtained by combining structure measures and BMD (r = 0.85, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro study showed a significant correlation between structure measures and biomechanical strength, which was comparable to BMD and strength. However, best correlations were obtained by combining both measures. Using both BMD and structure measures therefore may improve the prediction of biomechanically determined bone strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10506888     DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  5 in total

1.  Does thoracic or lumbar spine bone architecture predict vertebral failure strength more accurately than density?

Authors:  E-M Lochmüller; K Pöschl; L Würstlin; M Matsuura; R Müller; T M Link; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Galateia J Kazakia; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 3.  The Founder's Lecture 2009: advances in imaging of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Thomas Marc Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Extended compilation of autopsy-material measurements on lumbar ultimate compressive strength for deriving reference values in ergonomic work design: The Revised Dortmund Recommendations.

Authors:  Matthias Jäger
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.068

5.  Texture Analysis Using CT and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI Can Improve Differentiation Between Patients With and Without Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Authors:  Nico Sollmann; Edoardo A Becherucci; Christof Boehm; Malek El Husseini; Stefan Ruschke; Egon Burian; Jan S Kirschke; Thomas M Link; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Roland Krug; Thomas Baum; Michael Dieckmeyer
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.555

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.