Literature DB >> 10723211

The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention.

P Bertelson1, J Vroomen, B de Gelder, J Driver.   

Abstract

It is well known that discrepancies in the location of synchronized auditory and visual events can lead to mislocalizations of the auditory source, so-called ventriloquism. In two experiments, we tested whether such cross-modal influences on auditory localization depend on deliberate visual attention to the biasing visual event. In Experiment 1, subjects pointed to the apparent source of sounds in the presence or absence of a synchronous peripheral flash. They also monitored for target visual events, either at the location of the peripheral flash or in a central location. Auditory localization was attracted toward the synchronous peripheral flash, but this was unaffected by where deliberate visual attention was directed in the monitoring task. In Experiment 2, bilateral flashes were presented in synchrony with each sound, to provide competing visual attractors. When these visual events were equally salient on the two sides, auditory localization was unaffected by which side subjects monitored for visual targets. When one flash was larger than the other, auditory localization was slightly but reliably attracted toward it, but again regardless of where visual monitoring was required. We conclude that ventriloquism largely reflects automatic sensory interactions, with little or no role for deliberate spatial attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10723211     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  51 in total

1.  Crossmodal binding of fear in voice and face.

Authors:  R J Dolan; J S Morris; B de Gelder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Is cross-modal integration of emotional expressions independent of attentional resources?

Authors:  J Vroomen; J Driver; B de Gelder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Kenneth C Roberts; Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object.

Authors:  Laura Busse; Kenneth C Roberts; Roy E Crist; Daniel H Weissman; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Visual cues can modulate integration and segregation of objects in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Martin Böckmann; Hellmut von Specht; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Jordi Navarra; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mozolic; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Neural processing of asynchronous audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Nicholas A Altieri; Sunah Kim; David B Pisoni; Thomas W James
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.