Literature DB >> 21431431

Searching for audiovisual correspondence in multiple speaker scenarios.

Agnès Alsius1, Salvador Soto-Faraco.   

Abstract

A critical question in multisensory processing is how the constant information flow that arrives to our different senses is organized in coherent representations. Some authors claim that pre-attentive detection of inter-sensory correlations supports crossmodal binding, whereas other findings indicate that attention plays a crucial role. We used visual and auditory search tasks for speaking faces to address the role of selective spatial attention in audiovisual binding. Search efficiency amongst faces for the match with a voice declined with the number of faces being monitored concurrently, consistent with an attentive search mechanism. In contrast, search amongst auditory speech streams for the match with a face was independent of the number of streams being monitored concurrently, as long as localization was not required. We suggest that the fundamental differences in the way in which auditory and visual information is encoded play a limiting role in crossmodal binding. Based on these unisensory limitations, we provide a unified explanation for several previous apparently contradictory findings.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21431431     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2624-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention.

Authors:  P Bertelson; J Vroomen; B de Gelder; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

2.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object.

Authors:  Laura Busse; Kenneth C Roberts; Roy E Crist; Daniel H Weissman; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mozolic; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dual mechanisms for the cross-sensory spread of attention: how much do learned associations matter?

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading.

Authors:  J Driver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Ventriloquism in patients with unilateral visual neglect.

Authors:  P Bertelson; F Pavani; E Ladavas; J Vroomen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Efficient visual search from synchronized auditory signals requires transient audiovisual events.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; John Cass; Christian N L Olivers; Jan Theeuwes; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Multisensory integration: from fundamental principles to translational research.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Vincenzo Romei; Nienke van Atteveldt; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Micah M Murray; Pawel J Matusz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Capture of visual attention interferes with multisensory speech processing.

Authors:  Hanna Krause; Till R Schneider; Andreas K Engel; Daniel Senkowski
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-06

4.  Temporal structure in audiovisual sensory selection.

Authors:  Anne Kösem; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Developmental trends in the facilitation of multisensory objects with distractors.

Authors:  Harriet C Downing; Ayla Barutchu; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-20

6.  Limits of Perceived Audio-Visual Spatial Coherence as Defined by Reaction Time Measurements.

Authors:  Hanne Stenzel; Jon Francombe; Philip J B Jackson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Window of audio-visual simultaneity is unaffected by spatio-temporal visual clutter.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; John Cass; David Alais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effect of attentional load on audiovisual speech perception: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Riikka Möttönen; Mikko E Sams; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Kaisa Tiippana
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.