Literature DB >> 25810157

A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.

Demet Gurler1, Nathan Doyle, Edgar Walker, John Magnotti, Michael Beauchamp.   

Abstract

The McGurk effect is an illusion in which visual speech information dramatically alters the perception of auditory speech. However, there is a high degree of individual variability in how frequently the illusion is perceived: some individuals almost always perceive the McGurk effect, while others rarely do. Another axis of individual variability is the pattern of eye movements make while viewing a talking face: some individuals often fixate the mouth of the talker, while others rarely do. Since the talker's mouth carries the visual speech necessary information to induce the McGurk effect, we hypothesized that individuals who frequently perceive the McGurk effect should spend more time fixating the talker's mouth. We used infrared eye tracking to study eye movements as 40 participants viewed audiovisual speech. Frequent perceivers of the McGurk effect were more likely to fixate the mouth of the talker, and there was a significant correlation between McGurk frequency and mouth looking time. The noisy encoding of disparity model of McGurk perception showed that individuals who frequently fixated the mouth had lower sensory noise and higher disparity thresholds than those who rarely fixated the mouth. Differences in eye movements when viewing the talker's face may be an important contributor to interindividual differences in multisensory speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25810157      PMCID: PMC4437244          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0821-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  26 in total

1.  Hearing by eye: how much spatial degradation can be tolerated?

Authors:  J MacDonald; S Andersen; T Bachmann
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Unraveling multisensory integration: patchy organization within human STS multisensory cortex.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Brenna D Argall; Jerzy Bodurka; Jeff H Duyn; Alex Martin
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-10       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The effect of a concurrent working memory task and temporal offsets on the integration of auditory and visual speech information.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2012

4.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Neural correlates of interindividual differences in children's audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Audrey R Nath; Eswen E Fava; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spatial statistics of gaze fixations during dynamic face processing.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Loss of Central Vision and Audiovisual Speech Perception.

Authors:  Amanda Wilson; Adam Wilson; Martin W Ten Hove; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Vis Impair Res       Date:  2008

8.  Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The noisy encoding of disparity model of the McGurk effect.

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

10.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.

Authors:  John M Henderson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  15 in total

1.  Similar frequency of the McGurk effect in large samples of native Mandarin Chinese and American English speakers.

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Debshila Basu Mallick; Guo Feng; Bin Zhou; Wen Zhou; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Free viewing of talking faces reveals mouth and eye preferring regions of the human superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Johannes Rennig; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Face viewing behavior predicts multisensory gain during speech perception.

Authors:  Johannes Rennig; Kira Wegner-Clemens; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

4.  Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.

Authors:  Antoine J Shahin; Kristina C Backer; Lawrence D Rosenblum; Jess R Kerlin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The categories, frequencies, and stability of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns to faces.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Large Scale Functional Brain Networks Underlying Temporal Integration of Audio-Visual Speech Perception: An EEG Study.

Authors:  G Vinodh Kumar; Tamesh Halder; Amit K Jaiswal; Abhishek Mukherjee; Dipanjan Roy; Arpan Banerjee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-13

7.  A simple and efficient method to enhance audiovisual binding tendencies.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; David R Wozny; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  A Laboratory Study of the McGurk Effect in 324 Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins.

Authors:  Guo Feng; Bin Zhou; Wen Zhou; Michael S Beauchamp; John F Magnotti
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Skilled musicians are not subject to the McGurk effect.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Gemma Massetti; Ezia Rizzi; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Temporal Audiovisual Motion Prediction in 2D- vs. 3D-Environments.

Authors:  Sandra Dittrich; Tömme Noesselt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.