Literature DB >> 21302979

A method for evaluating the relation between sound source segregation and masking.

Robert A Lutfi1, Ching-Ju Liu.   

Abstract

Sound source segregation refers to the ability to hear as separate entities two or more sound sources comprising a mixture. Masking refers to the ability of one sound to make another sound difficult to hear. Often in studies, masking is assumed to result from a failure of segregation, but this assumption may not always be correct. Here a method is offered to identify the relation between masking and sound source segregation in studies and an example is given of its application.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21302979      PMCID: PMC3037974          DOI: 10.1121/1.3519871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-24

2.  Auditory masking: need for improved conceptual structure.

Authors:  Nat Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task.

Authors:  B G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing.

Authors:  T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  M B Sachs; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Continuous versus gated pedestals and the "severe departure" from Weber's law.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level.

Authors:  C C Wier; W Jesteadt; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparison of the effect of onset asynchrony on auditory grouping in pitch matching and vowel identification.

Authors:  R W Hukin; C J Darwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

9.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; P S Deliwala; W S Woods; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sources of auditory masking in infants: distraction effects.

Authors:  L A Werner; J Y Bargones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Toward an objective measure for a "stream segregation" task.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Eva Maria Carreira; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory streaming of tones of uncertain frequency, level, and duration.

Authors:  An-Chieh Chang; Robert A Lutfi; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A new approach to sound source segregation.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe N J Stoelinga
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  A Detection-Theoretic Analysis of Auditory Streaming and Its Relation to Auditory Masking.

Authors:  An-Chieh Chang; Robert Lutfi; Jungmee Lee; Inseok Heo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 3.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.