Literature DB >> 21361412

Target enhancement and noise cancellation in the identification of a rudimentary sound source in noise.

Robert A Lutfi1, Ching-Ju Liu.   

Abstract

Perturbation analysis was used to determine the relative contribution of target enhancement and noise cancellation in the identification of rudimentary sound source in noise. In a two-interval, forced-choice procedure, listeners identified the impact sound produced by the larger of two stretched membranes as target. The noise on each presentation was the impact sound of a variable-sized plate. For four of five listeners, the relative weights on the noise were positive indicating enhancement, and for the remaining listeners, they were negative indicating cancellation. The results underscore the difficulty with evaluating models of masking solely in terms of measures of performance accuracy.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361412      PMCID: PMC3048881          DOI: 10.1121/1.3533000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual differences in source identification from synthesized impact sounds.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modeling comodulation masking release using an equalization-cancellation mechanism.

Authors:  Tobias Piechowiak; Stephan D Ewert; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Level dominance in sound source identification.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Continuous versus gated pedestals and the "severe departure" from Weber's law.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Identification of concurrent harmonic and inharmonic vowels: a test of the theory of harmonic cancellation and enhancement.

Authors:  A de Cheveigné; S McAdams; J Laroche; M Rosenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level.

Authors:  C C Wier; W Jesteadt; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sources of auditory masking in infants: distraction effects.

Authors:  L A Werner; J Y Bargones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-11

9.  Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  R Meddis; M J Hewitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  A new approach to sound source segregation.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe N J Stoelinga
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Lynn Gilbertson; Inseok Heo; An-Chieh Chang; Jacob Stamas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Estimates of decision weights and internal noise in the masked discrimination of vowels by young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Lynn Gilbertson; Robert A Lutfi; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Correlations of decision weights and cognitive function for the masked discrimination of vowels by young and old adults.

Authors:  Lynn Gilbertson; Robert A Lutfi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.