Literature DB >> 23716225

A new approach to sound source segregation.

Robert A Lutfi1, Ching-Ju Liu, Christophe N J Stoelinga.   

Abstract

We rely critically on our ability to 'hear out' (segregate) individual sound sources in a mixture. Yet, despite its importance, little is known regarding this -ability. Perturbation analysis is a psychophysical method that has been successfully applied to related problems in vision [Murray, R.F. 2011. J. of Vision 11, 1-25]. Here the approach is adapted to audition. The application proceeds in three stages: First, simple speech and environmental sounds are synthesized according to a generative model of the sound--producing source. Second, listener decision strategy in segregating target from non--target (noise) sources is determined from decision weights (regression coefficients) relating listener judgments regarding the target to lawful perturbations in acoustic parameters, as dictated by the generative model. Third, factors limiting segregation are identified by comparing the obtained weights and residuals to those of a maximum-likelihood (ML) observer that optimizes segregation based on the equations of motion of the generating source. Here, the approach is applied to test between the two major models of sound source segregation; target enhancement versus noise cancellation. The results indicate a tendency of noise segregation to preempt target enhancement when the noise source is unchanging. However, the results also show individual differences in segregation strategy that are not evident in the measures of performance accuracy alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23716225      PMCID: PMC5217168          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  13 in total

1.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual differences in source identification from synthesized impact sounds.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modeling comodulation masking release using an equalization-cancellation mechanism.

Authors:  Tobias Piechowiak; Stephan D Ewert; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Level dominance in sound source identification.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A method for evaluating the relation between sound source segregation and masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Target enhancement and noise cancellation in the identification of a rudimentary sound source in noise.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Continuous versus gated pedestals and the "severe departure" from Weber's law.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Identification of concurrent harmonic and inharmonic vowels: a test of the theory of harmonic cancellation and enhancement.

Authors:  A de Cheveigné; S McAdams; J Laroche; M Rosenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level.

Authors:  C C Wier; W Jesteadt; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sources of auditory masking in infants: distraction effects.

Authors:  L A Werner; J Y Bargones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual Differences in Behavioural Decision Weights Related to Irregularities in Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Inseok Heo; An-Chieh Chang; Kristen Bond; Christophe Stoelinga; Robert Lutfi; Glenis Long
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.