Literature DB >> 1787242

Some effects of auditory grouping factors on modulation detection interference (MDI).

J W Hall1, J H Grose.   

Abstract

The ability to detect the existence of amplitude modulation at a target frequency is reduced when amplitude modulation exists at a flanking frequency. This effect has been termed modulation detection interference (MDI) [Yost and Sheft, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 848-857 (1989)]. One explanation for MDI holds that the masking and target frequencies are grouped together by the auditory system such that it is difficult to analyze the modulation at each frequency separately. The present study investigated conditions where the asynchrony of temporal gating of the target and flanking frequencies was manipulated in order to make the frequencies more or less likely to be grouped together by the auditory system and perceived as originating from a single putative source. A second experimental manipulation attempted to perceptually segregate the masking and target frequencies on the basis of harmonicity or spectral proximity. The results of the experiments indicated that manipulations that were intended to enhance the segregation of the masking and target frequencies reduced the magnitude of MDI effects. This generally supported an interpretation that MDI is related in some way to auditory grouping. A final experiment was performed in which the subject had to detect the presence of amplitude modulation, but also had to identify which of two frequency components carried the modulation. Subjects were often poor in discriminating which of two frequencies was amplitude modulated, even when the modulation itself was clearly audible. It was concluded that part of the MDI effect might be due to the poor ability of the auditory system to associate modulation with the carrier of the modulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1787242     DOI: 10.1121/1.401777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

2.  Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

3.  Binaural comodulation masking release: effects of masker interaural correlation.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of masker level uncertainty on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Age-Related Changes in Processing Simultaneous Amplitude Modulated Sounds Assessed Using Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-23

6.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant listeners under forward masking conditions.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Amplitude modulation detection and modulation masking in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Christian Lorenzi; Laurianne Cabrera; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Within- and across-channel factors in the multiband comodulation masking release paradigm.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of pulsing of a target tone on the ability to hear it out in different types of complex sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.