Literature DB >> 18177155

The effect of masker level uncertainty on intensity discrimination.

Emily Buss1.   

Abstract

Thresholds were measured for detection of an increment in level of a 60-dB SPL target tone at 1 kHz, either in quiet or in the presence of maskers at 0.5 and 2 kHz. Interval-by-interval level rove applied independently to remote masker tones substantially elevated thresholds compared to intensity discrimination in quiet, an effect on the order of 10+dB [10 log(DeltaII)]. Asynchronous onset and stimulus envelope mismatches across frequency reduced but did not eliminate masking. A preinterval cue to signal frequency had no effect, but cuing masker frequency reduced thresholds, whether or not masker level was also cued. About 1 to 2 dB of threshold elevation in these conditions can be attributed to energetic masking. Decreasing the overall presentation level and increasing masker separation essentially eliminates energetic masking; under these conditions masker level rove elevates thresholds by approximately 7 dB when the target and masker tones are gated synchronously. This masking persists even when the flanking masker tones are presented contralateral to the target. Results suggest that observers tend to listen synthetically, even in conditions when this strategy reduces sensitivity to the intensity increment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18177155      PMCID: PMC2265089          DOI: 10.1121/1.2812578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  39 in total

1.  Some effects of auditory grouping factors on modulation detection interference (MDI).

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comodulation masking release and auditory grouping.

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Use of perceptual weights to test a model of loudness summation.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Suppression and the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; C J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Nonmonotonicity of informational masking.

Authors:  E L Oh; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effects of amplitude perturbation and increasing numbers of components in profile analysis.

Authors:  J J Lentz; V M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory profile analysis: is there perceptual constancy for spectral shape for stimuli roved in frequency?

Authors:  H Gockel; H Colonius
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comodulation masking release: is comodulation sufficient?

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Level discrimination of single tones in a multitone complex by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  K A Doherty; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of masker-spectral variability and masker fringes in children and adults.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  The role of off-frequency masking in binaural hearing.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Across-channel interference in intensity discrimination: the role of practice and listening strategy.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Method-of-adjustment measures of informational masking between auditory streams.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of external noise on detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Kim S Schairer; Lance Nizami; Samar Khaddam; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.