Literature DB >> 19173415

Within- and across-channel factors in the multiband comodulation masking release paradigm.

John H Grose1, Emily Buss, Joseph W Hall.   

Abstract

Maskers made up of comodulated narrow bands of noise can result in a signal detection advantage due to both within- and across-channel processes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether contributions from these processes could be differentiated on the basis of two stimulus manipulations: (1) onset/offset asynchrony across bands and (2) introduction of a random temporal fringe surrounding the comodulated bands. The hypothesis was that only masking release due to across-channel processing would be disrupted by these manipulations. Five-band comodulated maskers were constructed, and the availability of within- and across-channel cues was varied by adjusting the frequency spacing of the bands; both logarithmic and linear spacings were tested. The signal was a 1 kHz pure tone. Onset/offset asynchrony had different effects depending on the characteristics of the asynchrony. The results were consistent with an interpretation that across-channel, but not within-channel, masking release was disrupted when the flanking bands were presented continuously and the on-signal band was gated. However, the results suggested that both the across-channel and the within-channel masking release were disrupted in conditions where the on-signal band was continuous and the flanking bands were gated on, as well as in conditions where a random temporal fringe was present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173415      PMCID: PMC2677279          DOI: 10.1121/1.3023067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model.

Authors:  J L Verhey; T Dau; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Tests of a within-channel account of comodulation detection differences.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Stephen J Borrill
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Daniel Pressnitzer; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Detection of spectrally complex signals in comodulated maskers: effect of temporal fringe.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; Debora R Hatch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Components of monaural envelope correlation perception.

Authors:  V M Richards
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comodulation detection differences using noise-band signals.

Authors:  D McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of cross-spectrum correlation on the detectability of a noise band.

Authors:  M F Cohen; E D Schubert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Transient masking and the temporal course of simultaneous tone-on-tone masking.

Authors:  S P Bacon; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Spectral profile cues in comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Across-frequency envelope correlation discrimination and masked signal detection.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Features of across-frequency envelope coherence critical for comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Masked detection and discrimination of tone sequences under conditions of monaural and binaural masking release.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Assessing the effects of temporal coherence on auditory stream formation through comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Simon Krogholt Christiansen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The role of temporal coherence and temporal predictability in the build-up of auditory grouping.

Authors:  Joseph Sollini; Katarina C Poole; Dominic Blauth-Muszkowski; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Comodulation Enhances Signal Detection via Priming of Auditory Cortical Circuits.

Authors:  Joseph Sollini; Paul Chadderton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.