Literature DB >> 29495705

Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant listeners under forward masking conditions.

Monita Chatterjee1, Aditya M Kulkarni1.   

Abstract

Little is known about cochlear implant (CI) users' ability to process amplitude modulation (AM) under conditions of forward masking (forward-modulation detection/discrimination interference, or F-MDI). In this study, F-MDI was investigated in adult CI listeners using direct electrical stimulation via research interface. The target was sinusoidally amplitude modulated at 50 Hz, and presented to a fixed electrode in the middle of the array. The forward masker was either amplitude modulated at the same rate (AM) or unmodulated and presented at the peak amplitude of its AM counterpart (steady-state peak, SSP). Results showed that the AM masker produced higher modulation thresholds in the target than the SSP masker. The difference (F-MDI) was estimated to be 4.6 dB on average, and did not change with masker-target delays up to 100 ms or with masker-target spatial electrode distances up to eight electrodes. Results with a coherent remote cue presented with the masker showed that confusion effects did not play a role in the observed F-MDI. Traditional recovery from forward masking using the same maskers and a 20-ms probe, measured in four of the subjects, confirmed the expected result: higher thresholds with the SSP masker than the AM masker. Collectively, the results indicate that significant F-MDI occurs in CI users.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29495705      PMCID: PMC5821512          DOI: 10.1121/1.5025059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Modulation detection interference: effects of concurrent and sequential streaming.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; T Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Forward masking in the amplitude-modulation domain for tone carriers: psychophysical results and physiological correlates.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Paul C Nelson; Neal F Viemeister; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-23

3.  Forward masking of amplitude modulation: basic characteristics.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Some effects of auditory grouping factors on modulation detection interference (MDI).

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modulation detection interference using random and sinusoidal amplitude modulation.

Authors:  L Mendoza; J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Y Cazals; M Pelizzone; O Saudan; C Boex
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments.

Authors:  W Jesteadt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

9.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Sequential stream segregation in normally-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Yang-Wenyi Liu; Duo-Duo Tao; Bing Chen; Xiaoting Cheng; Yilai Shu; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Pleasantness Ratings for Harmonic Intervals With Acoustic and Electric Hearing in Unilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Emily R Spitzer; David M Landsberger; David R Friedmann; John J Galvin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.