Literature DB >> 17848026

Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: evidence for within-list criterion changes.

William E Hockley1, Marty W Niewiadomski.   

Abstract

Strength-based mirror effects occur when the hit rate is higher and the false alarm rate is lower following strongly encoded study lists than when following more weakly encoded study lists. In Experiments 1A and 1B, strength-based mirror effects were observed in separate tests of single item and associative recognition for random word pairs. In Experiment 2, strength-based mirror effects were again seen when item and associative recognition were tested together. Finally, in Experiments 3 and 4, opposing strength-based mirror effects were observed for item and associative recognition when individual words and word pairs were presented at different rates in the same study lists. Strength-based mirror effects could result from participants' adopting a more conservative decision criterion following strong lists than following weak ones. If this is the case for both item and associative recognition, the present results demonstrate that subjects can adopt different response criteria for different recognition tasks and can alternate between them on a trial-by-trial basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17848026     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  36 in total

1.  Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.

Authors:  D L Westerman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Jocelyn E Holden; Richard M Shiffren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models.

Authors:  S D Gronlund; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Neal E A Kroll
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

6.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; S E Clark; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

10.  Strategies of text retrieval: a criterion shift account.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Nathalie Gagnon; Eric Richards
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  The picture superiority effect in associative recognition.

Authors:  William E Hockley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

3.  Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: a recognition memory study.

Authors:  Elissa M Aminoff; David Clewett; Scott Freeman; Amy Frithsen; Christine Tipper; Arianne Johnson; Scott T Grafton; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

4.  Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Murray Singer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

5.  Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  Davide Bruno; Philip A Higham; Timothy J Perfect
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

6.  The criterion-calibration model of cue interaction in contingency judgments.

Authors:  Samuel D Hannah; Lorraine G Allan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hilford; Murray Glanzer; Kisok Kim; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02

8.  The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.

Authors:  Bryan A Franks; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-11

9.  Cue quality and criterion setting in recognition memory.

Authors:  Christopher Kent; Koen Lamberts; Richard Patton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

10.  Associative recognition and the list strength paradigm.

Authors:  Adam F Osth; Simon Dennis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.