Literature DB >> 24317960

Associative recognition and the list strength paradigm.

Adam F Osth1, Simon Dennis.   

Abstract

When a subset of list items is strengthened, the discriminability of the nonstrengthened items is unaffected. This regularity has been dubbed the null list strength effect (LSE), and despite its many replications in item recognition, little research has investigated whether an LSE occurs in associative recognition. We conducted two experiments in which a set of pairs were studied once and a set of interference pairs were studied either once (pure-weak-list condition) or four times (mixed-list condition). Equivalent levels of performance for the nonstrengthened pairs were observed in both the pure-weak and mixed conditions using both yes-no and two-alternative forced choice testing. Additionally, equivalent false alarm rates were observed between rearranged pairs composed of weak and strong items. Both sets of results were found to be consistent with a matrix model that has no overlap among its item representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24317960     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0386-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  52 in total

1.  Testing global memory models using ROC curves.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; C F Sheu; S D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The "one-shot" hypothesis for context storage.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults.

Authors:  Leah L Light; Meredith M Patterson; Christie Chung; Michael R Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

4.  Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

5.  The list strength effect: a contextual competition account.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10

6.  Interference and the representation of events in memory.

Authors:  K Murnane; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory.

Authors:  James L McClelland; Bruce L McNaughton; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall.

Authors:  S E Clark; R E Burchett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-01

9.  Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition.

Authors:  Laura Mickes; Emily M Johnson; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  A context noise model of episodic word recognition.

Authors:  S Dennis; M S Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Are associations formed across pairs? A test of learning by temporal contiguity in associative recognition.

Authors:  Adam F Osth; Julian Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.