Literature DB >> 14979807

Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency.

Kenneth J Malmberg1, Jocelyn E Holden, Richard M Shiffren.   

Abstract

Judgments of frequency for targets (old items) and foils (similar; dissimilar) steadily increase as the number of times a target is studied increases, but discrimination of targets from similar foils does not steadily improve, a phenomenon termed registration without learning (D. L. Hintzman & T. Curran, 1995; D. L. Hintzman, T. Curran, & B. Oppy, 1992). The present experiment explores this phenomenon with words of differing normative word frequency. The retrieving-effectively-from-memory model (REM; R. M. Shifrrin & M. Steyvers, 1997, 1998) predicts that low-frequency words will be better recognized than high-frequency words because low-frequency words have more distinctive memory representations. A corollary of this assumption predicts that the typical recognition word-frequency effect will be disrupted when similar foils are tested. These predictions were confirmed, but to fit both the recognition and the judgment-of-frequency data, the authors used a "dual-process" extension of the REM model.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14979807     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  16 in total

1.  Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults.

Authors:  Leah L Light; Meredith M Patterson; Christie Chung; Michael R Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

2.  The effects of word frequency and similarity on recognition judgments: the role of recollection.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Lynne M Reder; Daniel Dickison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Effects of repetition and response deadline on item recognition in young and older adults.

Authors:  Leah L Light; Christie Chung; Regina Pendergrass; Jeffrey C Van Ocker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

4.  The influence of averaging and noisy decision strategies on the recognition memory ROC.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Jing Xu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

Review 5.  Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder; Jason Arndt; Heekyeong Park
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

6.  Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

7.  On the flexibility and the fallibility of associative memory.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Jing Xu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

8.  Memory for Items and Associations: Distinct Representations and Processes in Associative Recognition.

Authors:  Norbou G Buchler; Leah L Light; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: evidence for within-list criterion changes.

Authors:  William E Hockley; Marty W Niewiadomski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

Review 10.  50 years of research sparked by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968).

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Jeroen G W Raaijmakers; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.