Literature DB >> 17823805

Factors influencing lymph node harvest in colorectal surgery.

M Gelos1, J Gelhaus, P Mehnert, G Bonhag, M Sand, S Philippou, B Mann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer is a critical component concerning prognosis and survival of patients. Several variables influence the number of harvested lymph nodes (LN). However, results of studies are contradictory, and influencing factors remain to be identified. The aim of the present study was to identify factors that have a significant influence on the number of assessed LN in oncologic colorectal cancer resection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and forty-one patients (190 men and 151 women), who underwent a colorectal cancer resection in a curative intention in the years 2000-2005, were analysed retrospectively. All specimens were histologically examined by two pathologists.
RESULTS: In a median, 15.1 LN per operation were resected. Early tumour stage (p<0.01), length of resected bowel segment (p<0.05) and right-sided location (p<0.001) had a significant influence on the number of resected LN. Age, gender, surgeon volume, differentiation of the tumour, LN metastases, lymphatic invasion and depth of tumour invasion had no significant association with harvested LN number. Furthermore, the presence or absence of the vermiform appendix and the length of the resected ileum segment in right-sided resections did not significantly affect the assessed LN.
CONCLUSION: The question arises whether for colorectal cancers of all locations the same amount of resected and analysed LNs should be lasting to fulfill oncologic criteria, as the number of harvested LNs depends on several parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17823805     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0378-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  Minimal number of lymph nodes that need to be examined for adequate staging of colorectal cancer--factors influencing lymph node harvest.

Authors:  Matija Horzic; Mario Kopljar
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

2.  Adjuvant therapy for colon cancer--the pace quickens.

Authors:  Carmen Allegra; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; W Sanford; M Coffey; L J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Prognosis of node-positive colon cancer.

Authors:  A M Cohen; S Tremiterra; F Candela; H T Thaler; E R Sigurdson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Harry S Wieand; Daniel G Haller; Richard Gray; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Marc Buyse; Roberto Labianca; Jean Francois Seitz; Christopher J O'Callaghan; Guido Francini; Axel Grothey; Michael O'Connell; Paul J Catalano; Charles D Blanke; David Kerr; Erin Green; Norman Wolmark; Thierry Andre; Richard M Goldberg; Aimery De Gramont
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes.

Authors:  Adam C Berger; Elin R Sigurdson; Thomas LeVoyer; Alexandra Hanlon; Robert J Mayer; John S Macdonald; Paul J Catalano; Daniel G Haller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Colorectal adenocarcinoma: quality of the assessment of lymph node metastases.

Authors:  F Hernanz; S Revuelta; C Redondo; C Madrazo; J Castillo; M Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Effect of the surgeon's specialty interest on the type of resection performed for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D H Reinbach; J R McGregor; G D Murray; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Paul M Johnson; Dickram Malatjalian; Geoff A Porter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  18 in total

1.  Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.

Authors:  F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  T1 colon cancer in the era of screening: risk factors and treatment.

Authors:  F Bianco; S De Franciscis; A Belli; A Falato; R Fusco; D F Altomare; A Amato; C R Asteria; A Avallone; G A Binda; L Boccia; P Buzzo; M Carvello; C Coco; P Delrio; P De Nardi; M Di Lena; A Failla; F La Torre; M La Torre; M Lemma; P Luffarelli; G Manca; I Maretto; F Marino; A Muratore; A Pascariello; S Pucciarelli; D Rega; V Ripetti; G Rizzo; A Serventi; A Spinelli; F Tatangelo; E D L Urso; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Metastatic lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marco Ettore Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Paola Cassoni; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Giuseppe Giraudo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Extended lymphadenectomy in rectal cancer is debatable.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Surgery has a key role for quality assurance of colorectal cancer screening programs: impact of the third level multidisciplinary team on lymph nodal staging.

Authors:  Francesco Bianco; Silvia De Franciscis; Andrea Belli; Maria Di Lena; Antonio Avallone; Maria Antonia Bianco; Sabato Di Marzo; Letizia Gigli; Gianluca Rotondano; Silvana Russo Spena; Fabiana Tatangelo; Alfonso Tempesta; Giovanni Maria Romano
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Predictors of lymph node count in colorectal cancer resections: data from US nationwide prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Teppei Morikawa; Noriko Tanaka; Aya Kuchiba; Katsuhiko Nosho; Mai Yamauchi; Jason L Hornick; Richard S Swanson; Andrew T Chan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Curtis Huttenhower; Deborah Schrag; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Isidoro Di Carlo; Roberto Scilletta; Beniamino Scilletta; Stefano Puleo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Non-surgical factors influencing lymph node yield in colon cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Wood; Colin Peirce; Jurgen Mulsow
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-05-15

9.  Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Galal El-Gazzaz; Tracy Hull; Jeffery Hammel; Daniel Geisler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Factors that influence 12 or more harvested lymph nodes in early-stage colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chao-Wen Hsu; Chieh-Hsin Lin; Jui-Ho Wang; Hsin-Tai Wang; Wen-Chieh Ou; Tai-Ming King
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.