Literature DB >> 8168417

Colorectal adenocarcinoma: quality of the assessment of lymph node metastases.

F Hernanz1, S Revuelta, C Redondo, C Madrazo, J Castillo, M Gómez-Fleitas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have studied 193 cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma from a population-based register to determine the minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined to provide an accurate assessment of the presence of nodal metastases.
METHODS: The mean total number of lymph nodes identified per surgical specimen was 11 +/- 6.8 (range, 1-36) using traditional dissection. One hundred eighteen specimens (61 percent) were classified as Dukes B. Seventy-five (39 percent) had lymph node metastases (Dukes C) with a mean of 3.3 +/- 4.7 positive lymph nodes per specimen. With binomial distribution we calculate the probability to find at least one positive node in a sample size n with a determined proportion of positive nodes.
RESULTS: The error probability in the ganglionar assessment by traditional dissection was 0.05 with 6 examined lymph nodes and 0.01 with 10 examined nodes.
CONCLUSION: We must provide the pathologist with a minimum of six examined lymph nodes per surgical specimen for an optimal Dukes B assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8168417     DOI: 10.1007/bf02053600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  37 in total

1.  The influence of nodal size on the staging of colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Nodal staging of colorectal carcinomas and sentinel nodes.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Can adequate lymphadenectomy be obtained by laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer? Results of a case-control study in 200 patients.

Authors:  Samer Sara; Gilles Poncet; David Voirin; Marie-Hélène Laverriere; Daniel Anglade; Jean-Luc Faucheron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Lymph node yield after colectomy for cancer: is absence of mismatch repair a factor?

Authors:  Tushar Samdani; Molly Schultheis; Zsofia Stadler; Jinru Shia; Tiffany Fancher; Justine Misholy; Martin R Weiser; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  [Acetone compression. A fast, standardized method to investigate gastrointestinal lymph nodes].

Authors:  O Basten; D Bandorski; C Bismarck; K Neumann; A Fisseler-Eckhoff
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  The pathologist's role in rectal cancer patient assessments.

Authors:  Joseph E Willis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

7.  How many lymph nodes are necessary to stage early and advanced adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon and upper rectum?

Authors:  Sebastian Leibl; Oleksiyy Tsybrovskyy; Helmut Denk
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Galal El-Gazzaz; Tracy Hull; Jeffery Hammel; Daniel Geisler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Factors influencing lymph node harvest in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  M Gelos; J Gelhaus; P Mehnert; G Bonhag; M Sand; S Philippou; B Mann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The optimal number of lymph nodes examined in stage II colorectal cancer and its impact of on outcomes.

Authors:  Hok Kwok Choi; Wai Lun Law; Jensen T C Poon
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.