Literature DB >> 19517186

Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

Galal El-Gazzaz1, Tracy Hull, Jeffery Hammel, Daniel Geisler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the number of lymph nodes (LNs) harvested after laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer resections.
METHODS: Between 1996 and 2007, 431 colorectal cancer patients underwent laparoscopic resection. During the periods of 1996-1997, 2002-2003, and 2006-2007, 243 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection were matched 1-2 by age, operation, gender, operation date, body mass index (BMI), and tumor stage (TNM) to 486 patients undergoing open surgery. The numbers of examined and involved LNs were compared according to tumor location and year of surgery.
RESULTS: Colorectal cancer resections (243 laparoscopic and 486 open procedures) were performed for 729 patients (447 men) with a mean age of 66.2 +/- 12.3 years and a mean BMI of 28.5 +/- 7.3. The mean number of LNs per case was 24.8 +/- 20.6. The number of LNs retrieved did not differ between laparoscopic and open surgery (p = 0.4). A significant difference was observed between the number of involved LNs retrieved laparoscopically (2.2 +/- 3.8) and the number retrieved by open surgery (1.6 +/- 4; p = 0.03). There were significant differences between the numbers of LNs retrieved from the right colon (28.1 +/- 14.6), left colon (24.5 +/- 17.6), and rectum (19.1 +/- 15.1) (p < 0.001). There were significantly fewer examined LNs in laparoscopic than in open cases during 2002 and 2003 (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer can achieve lymph node retrieval similar to that achieved by the open approach. In this era of new technology, laparoscopic lymph node harvest is becoming more optimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19517186     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0534-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  33 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Laparoscopic resection does not adversely affect early survival curves in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  E C Poulin; J Mamazza; C M Schlachta; R Grégoire; N Roy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Henry J Lujan; Gustavo Plasencia; Moises Jacobs; Manuel Viamonte; Rene F Hartmann
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; W Sanford; M Coffey; L J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J H Wong; R Severino; M B Honnebier; P Tom; T S Namiki
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period.

Authors:  Sanjiv K Patankar; Sergio W Larach; Andrea Ferrara; Paul R Williamson; Joseph T Gallagher; Samuel DeJesus; Shekar Narayanan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Does laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increase exfoliated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer?

Authors:  S H Kim; J W Milsom; T L Gramlich; S M Toddy; G I Shore; J Okuda; V W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic-assisted and open high anterior resection within an ERAS protocol.

Authors:  Ulf O Gustafsson; Marit Tiefenthal; Anders Thorell; Olle Ljungqvist; Jonas Nygrens
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: examining lymph nodes or standardizing surgery?

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott; Christos Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Thresholds and combined quality control in the multimodal treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios H Roukos; Georgios Baltogiannis; Christos G Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Optimizing lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable.

Authors:  Jamie Murphy; Tonia Young-Fadok
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Factors affecting lymph node yield from patients undergoing colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Zubin M Bamboat; Danielle Deperalta; Abdulmetin Dursun; David L Berger; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic variable in colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection.

Authors:  R Greenberg; R Itah; R Ghinea; E Sacham-Shmueli; R Inbar; S Avital
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Lymph node yield in right colectomy for cancer: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches.

Authors:  M Widmar; M Keskin; P Strombom; P Beltran; O S Chow; J J Smith; G M Nash; J Shia; D Russell; J Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Isidoro Di Carlo; Roberto Scilletta; Beniamino Scilletta; Stefano Puleo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark L H Ong; John B Schofield
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.