Literature DB >> 7924708

Effect of the surgeon's specialty interest on the type of resection performed for colorectal cancer.

D H Reinbach1, J R McGregor, G D Murray, P J O'Dwyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the type of resection performed for colorectal cancer by surgeons with a colorectal interest and compare this with the type of resection performed by surgeons with other specialty interests.
METHODS: One hundred sixteen patients had curative surgery performed for primary colorectal cancer over a one-year period by ten surgeons with four different specialty interests.
RESULTS: Surgeons with an interest in colorectal cancer resected twice as much colon (280 mm vs. 130 mm; P > 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test) and were more likely to remove adjacent clinically involved organs (15 percent vs. 0 percent) for left-sided colon and rectal cancers compared with surgeons with vascular or transplant interests. Surgeons with an interest in gastroenterology performed a resection that was intermediate between the colorectal and other specialty groups for left-sided cancers. Distal resection margins were significantly greater (55 mm vs. 20 mm; P > 0.001) for sigmoid cancers in the colorectal group, but were similar in all groups for rectal cancer. Resection lengths and margins for right-sided cancers were similar in all groups, although the number of lymph nodes retrieved from the mesentery was greater in the colorectal group (13 vs. 7.5; P = 0.08).
CONCLUSION: This study shows a wide variability in the type of resection performed for colorectal cancer and illustrates the need for clinical trials to evaluate the effect of such variability on patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7924708     DOI: 10.1007/bf02049316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

1.  Close collaboration between surgeon and pathologist is essential for accurate staging of early colon cancer.

Authors:  Anton J Bilchik; Carolyn Compton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Steven L Chen; Anton J Bilchik
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Surgeon specialty and operative mortality with lung resection.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; F L Lucas; Therese A Stukel; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Galal El-Gazzaz; Tracy Hull; Jeffery Hammel; Daniel Geisler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Factors influencing lymph node harvest in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  M Gelos; J Gelhaus; P Mehnert; G Bonhag; M Sand; S Philippou; B Mann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Factors that influence 12 or more harvested lymph nodes in early-stage colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chao-Wen Hsu; Chieh-Hsin Lin; Jui-Ho Wang; Hsin-Tai Wang; Wen-Chieh Ou; Tai-Ming King
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Stage migration resulting from inadequate number of examined lymph nodes impacts prognosis in stage II colon cancer after radical surgery.

Authors:  Di Xie; Xiangping Song; Lingling Tong
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Tumour markers of prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H L McLeod; G I Murray
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.