Literature DB >> 24587671

Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.

Giovanni Li Destri1, Isidoro Di Carlo1, Roberto Scilletta1, Beniamino Scilletta1, Stefano Puleo1.   

Abstract

Lymphadenectomy of colorectal cancer is a decisive factor for the prognostic and therapeutic staging of the patient. For over 15 years, we have asked ourselves if the minimum number of 12 examined lymph nodes (LNs) was sufficient for the prevention of understaging. The debate is certainly still open if we consider that a limit of 12 LNs is still not the gold standard mainly because the research methodology of the first studies has been criticized. Moreover many authors report that to date both in the United States and Europe the number "12" target is uncommon, not adequate, or accessible only in highly specialised centres. It should however be noted that both the pressing nature of the debate and the dissemination of guidelines have been responsible for a trend that has allowed for a general increase in the number of LNs examined. There are different variables that can affect the retrieval of LNs. Some, like the surgeon, the surgery, and the pathology exam, are without question modifiable; however, other both patient and disease-related variables are non-modifiable and pose the question of whether the minimum number of examined LNs must be individually assigned. The lymph nodal ratio, the sentinel LNs and the study of the biological aspects of the tumor could find valid application in this field in the near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Lymph node count; Lymph node ratio; Lymphadenectomy; Staging

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24587671      PMCID: PMC3934465          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i8.1951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  115 in total

1.  How many lymph nodes should be examined in Dukes' B colorectal cancer? Determination on the basis of cumulative survival rate.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Yoshimatsu; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Arihiro Umehara; Hajime Yokomizo; Kiyohito Yoshida; Takashi Fujimoto; Kiyo Watanabe; Kenji Ogawa
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  A national study on lymph node retrieval in resectional surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Jason J Smith; Alexander G Heriot; Ara W Darzi; Michael R Thompson; Jeffrey D Stamatakis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in a population-based collective of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Robert Rosenberg; Jutta Engel; Christiane Bruns; Wolfgang Heitland; Nikolaus Hermes; Karl-Walter Jauch; Reinhard Kopp; Eberhard Pütterich; Reinhard Ruppert; Tibor Schuster; Helmut Friess; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Individual surgeon, pathologist, and other factors affecting lymph node harvest in stage II colon carcinoma. is a minimum of 12 examined lymph nodes sufficient?

Authors:  Luca Stocchi; Victor W Fazio; Ian Lavery; Jeff Hammel
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J H Wong; R Severino; M B Honnebier; P Tom; T S Namiki
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Predictive model of outcome of targeted nodal assessment in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aviram Nissan; Mladjan Protic; Anton Bilchik; John Eberhardt; George E Peoples; Alexander Stojadinovic
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens.

Authors:  Michelle A Ostadi; Julie L Harnish; Stacey Stegienko; David R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Lymph node harvesting in colorectal carcinoma specimens.

Authors:  Emmanuel Lagoudianakis; Apostolos Pappas; Nikolaos Koronakis; Dimitrios Tsekouras; John Dallianoudis; Panagiota Kontogianni; Dimitrios Papanikolaou; John Chrysikos; George Karavitis; Haridimos Markogiannakis; Konstantinos Filis; Andreas Manouras
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb
View more
  32 in total

1.  Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.

Authors:  F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and prognosis of colorectal cancer. An independent prognostic factor still reliable.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Antonio Salvatore Rubino; Rosalia Latino; Fabio Giannone; Raffaele Lanteri; Beniamino Scilletta; Antonio Di Cataldo
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

3.  T1 colon cancer in the era of screening: risk factors and treatment.

Authors:  F Bianco; S De Franciscis; A Belli; A Falato; R Fusco; D F Altomare; A Amato; C R Asteria; A Avallone; G A Binda; L Boccia; P Buzzo; M Carvello; C Coco; P Delrio; P De Nardi; M Di Lena; A Failla; F La Torre; M La Torre; M Lemma; P Luffarelli; G Manca; I Maretto; F Marino; A Muratore; A Pascariello; S Pucciarelli; D Rega; V Ripetti; G Rizzo; A Serventi; A Spinelli; F Tatangelo; E D L Urso; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  The relation between oncologic outcomes and metastatic lymph node location following laparoscopic resection of stage III colon cancer.

Authors:  Han Deok Kwak; Jae Kyun Ju; Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Lymph Node Harvest After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer and Its Impact on Oncological Outcomes.

Authors:  Rajkumar Billakanti; Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri; Srikanth Soma; Hemanth Makineni; Shirley Sundersingh
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-24

6.  Surgery has a key role for quality assurance of colorectal cancer screening programs: impact of the third level multidisciplinary team on lymph nodal staging.

Authors:  Francesco Bianco; Silvia De Franciscis; Andrea Belli; Maria Di Lena; Antonio Avallone; Maria Antonia Bianco; Sabato Di Marzo; Letizia Gigli; Gianluca Rotondano; Silvana Russo Spena; Fabiana Tatangelo; Alfonso Tempesta; Giovanni Maria Romano
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections in the obese: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alastair Fung; Nora Trabulsi; Martin Morris; Richard Garfinkle; Abdulaziz Saleem; Steven D Wexner; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Marylise Boutros
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Population-based study to re-evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer.

Authors:  J C Del Paggio; Y Peng; X Wei; S Nanji; P H MacDonald; C Krishnan Nair; C M Booth
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Activated systemic inflammatory response at diagnosis reduces lymph node count in colonic carcinoma.

Authors:  Rory P Kennelly; Brenda Murphy; John O Larkin; Brian J Mehigan; Paul H McCormick
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  Stage II colon cancer staging using the number of retrieved lymph nodes may be superior to current TNM staging for prognosis stratification: the Japanese study group for postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shimpei Ogawa; Michio Itabashi; Yoshiko Bamba; Kimitaka Tani; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Shinichi Yamauchi; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.