Literature DB >> 12504228

Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study.

Paul M Johnson1, Dickram Malatjalian, Geoff A Porter.   

Abstract

The presence of nodal metastasis is a critical component of staging in colorectal cancer. Accurate assessment of nodal status requires sufficient node sampling, although the number of such nodes is controversial, with recommendations ranging from 6 to 17 nodes. The purpose of this study was to describe the nodal harvest in colorectal cancer and to identify factors associated with adequate lymph node harvest. Pathology reports from consecutive patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer undergoing resection between January 1997 and December 2000 at a tertiary care academic institution were reviewed. Identification of 12 or more lymph nodes was considered to be an adequate nodal harvest based on the current American Joint Committee on Cancer recommendations. Among the 579 consecutive specimens, the number of nodes identified was not stated for 10 (1.7%). Of the remaining 569 specimens, 4700 nodes were identified with a mean of 8.3 nodes per patient (median 7, range 0 to 60). Nodal metastases were identified in 219 patients (38.5%). Patients with one or more positive nodes had greater nodal harvest than those with negative nodes (9.5 vs. 8.2, respectively; P = 0.03). Only 22.4% of patients were found to have an adequate nodal harvest (> or =12 nodes). Right-sided resections, high surgeon volume, and gross examination of specimens by a staff pathologist were associated with higher nodal harvests, compared to left-sided resections, low surgeon volume, and gross examination of specimens by a pathology resident/technologist, respectively. There was no association with pathologist volume. In this study, nodal harvest in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer was highly variable. This problem appears to be multifactorial, and is related to patient, pathologic, and surgical factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12504228     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00131-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.267


  19 in total

1.  The importance of combining xylene clearance and immunohistochemistry in the accurate staging of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  N Y Haboubi; P Clark; S M Kaftan; P F Schofield
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Effect of preoperative radiochemotherapy on lymph node retrieval after resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Matthias W Wichmann; Christian Müller; Günther Meyer; Tim Strauss; Hans M Hornung; Ulla Lau-Werner; Martin K Angele; Friedrich W Schildberg
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-02

3.  Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  H Nelson; N Petrelli; A Carlin; J Couture; J Fleshman; J Guillem; B Miedema; D Ota; D Sargent
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; W Sanford; M Coffey; L J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Prognosis of node-positive colon cancer.

Authors:  A M Cohen; S Tremiterra; F Candela; H T Thaler; E R Sigurdson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J H Wong; R Severino; M B Honnebier; P Tom; T S Namiki
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Lymph node revealing solution and traditional 10% buffered formaldehyde for detecting lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Y J Jan; P C Huang; J T Chen; W L Ho
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei)       Date:  2000-02

8.  Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02.

Authors:  N Wolmark; H S Wieand; D M Hyams; L Colangelo; N V Dimitrov; E H Romond; M Wexler; D Prager; A B Cruz; P H Gordon; N J Petrelli; M Deutsch; E Mamounas; D L Wickerham; E R Fisher; H Rockette; B Fisher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance.

Authors:  K W Scott; R H Grace
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Effect of xylene clearance of mesenteric fat on harvest of lymph nodes after colonic resection.

Authors:  S M Cohen; S D Wexner; S L Schmitt; J J Nogueras; F V Lucas
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1994-12
View more
  40 in total

1.  Can adequate lymphadenectomy be obtained by laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer? Results of a case-control study in 200 patients.

Authors:  Samer Sara; Gilles Poncet; David Voirin; Marie-Hélène Laverriere; Daniel Anglade; Jean-Luc Faucheron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Lymph node yield after colectomy for cancer: is absence of mismatch repair a factor?

Authors:  Tushar Samdani; Molly Schultheis; Zsofia Stadler; Jinru Shia; Tiffany Fancher; Justine Misholy; Martin R Weiser; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Asymptomatic familial colon cancer with FDG-PET scanning for recurrent disease.

Authors:  Hugh J Freeman
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2005

4.  Reduced lymph node yield in rectal carcinoma specimen after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy has no prognostic relevance.

Authors:  Dietrich Doll; Ralf Gertler; Matthias Maak; Jan Friederichs; Karen Becker; Hans Geinitz; Monika Kriner; Hjalmar Nekarda; Jörg R Siewert; Robert Rosenberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Pathological examination of 12 regional lymph nodes and long-term survival in stages I-III colon cancer patients: an analysis of 2,056 consecutive patients in two branches of same institution.

Authors:  Hong Hwa Chen; Dilip Chakravarty K; Jeng-Yi Wang; Chung-Rong Changchien; Reiping Tang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Tumor micrometastases in mesorectal lymph nodes and their clinical significance in patients with rectal caner.

Authors:  Yang-Chun Zheng; Yu-Ying Tang; Zong-Guang Zhou; Li Li; Tian-Cai Wang; Yi-Ling Deng; Dai-Yun Chen; Wei-Ping Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Total number of lymph nodes harvested is associated with better survival in stages II and III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pramodh Chitral Chandrasinghe; Dileepa Senajith Ediriweera; Janaki Hewavisenthi; Sumudu Kumarage; Kemal Ismail Deen
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-19

8.  Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Galal El-Gazzaz; Tracy Hull; Jeffery Hammel; Daniel Geisler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Factors influencing lymph node harvest in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  M Gelos; J Gelhaus; P Mehnert; G Bonhag; M Sand; S Philippou; B Mann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Sialyl Lewis X expression and lymphatic microvessel density in primary tumors of node-negative colorectal cancer patients predict disease recurrence.

Authors:  Fania S Doekhie; Hans Morreau; Geertruida H de Bock; Frank M Speetjens; N Geeske Dekker-Ensink; Hein Putter; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2008-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.