| Literature DB >> 17711575 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The yeast ribosomal protein S9 (S9) is located at the entrance tunnel of the mRNA into the ribosome. It is known to play a role in accurate decoding and its bacterial homolog (S4) has recently been shown to be involved in opening RNA duplexes. Here we examined the effects of changing the C terminus of S9, which is rich in acidic amino acids and extends out of the ribosome surface.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17711575 PMCID: PMC2020489 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Expression of . A) Sequence of the C terminus of S9A, S9B and the deleted protein rps9-Δ188. Lowercase letters indicate identical residues. B) Northern blot analysis of RNA samples prepared from the parental strain (wt), strain deleted of only RPS9A gene (ΔRPS9A), strain deleted of only the RPS9B gene (ΔRPS9B) and strain deleted of both genes and supplemented with a single-copy plasmid containing rps9-Δ188. The membrane was hybridized with probes recognizing RPS9 ORF (upper panel), RPL41 (middle panel) and 18S rRNA (lower panel). C) Western analysis of the sedimentation profile of rps9-Δ188. Cells expressing flag-tagged rps9-Δ188 were harvested and the cell extract was separated by velocity sedimentation on a sucrose gradient. The gradient was fractionated into 14 fractions and the proteins of each fraction were subjected to western analysis using anti-flag antibodies. The sedimentation positions of ribosomal complexes were derived from the OD254 profile of the gradient (not shown) and are indicated at the bottom of the panel.
Figure 2Polysomal profiles of wild-type cells and cells expressing . Cells expressing only rps9-Δ188 gene (A) or both RPS9 genes (B) were grown to the mid-logarithmic phase and harvested. Cell lysates were separated on a 10%–50% sucrose gradient and the OD254 along the gradient was monitored. The sedimentation position of ribosomal complexes (40S, 60S, 80S and polysomes) is indicated on each panel.
Figure 3Comparison of northern blot results with microarrays data. A) RNA samples from each of the fractions collected for microarray analysis were separated on formaldehyde-agarose gel and subjected to northern blotting. Three blots were prepared, one from each experimental repeat (indicated by bars at the left). Blots were hybridized with probes complementary to the genes indicated at left of each panel and with a probe for the spiked-in Phe RNA. B) Comparison of quantitation results of the northern analysis with microarray data. Black bars represent the northern analysis signal from each fraction normalized to its corresponding signal of the Phe RNA and calculated as a percent of total signal of that mRNA in the gradient. Open bars represent the ratio obtained in the microarray analysis (note that the histogram has two Y-axes) normalized by a signal from the in vitro transcribed mRNAs. Fractions where open bars are missing indicate spots that did not pass the quality criteria in the microarray assay. Note that the Y-axis scale of the microarray results differs from gene to gene. This is probably due to differences in their mRNAs abundances compared to the reference sample.
Various features of groups of affected mRNAs
| Ribosome Differencea | Number of Genes | CAI | ΔG 5UTR (kcal/mol) | GC content (%) | ΔG ORF (kcal/mol) | ORF length (nts) | WT abundance (copies/cell) | Mutant abundancec (copies/cell) | t1/2 (min) |
| (-4) ≥ | 24 | 0.15b | 14.8 | 39 | 285 | 1189 | 1.7b | 1.5 | 16 |
| (-2)–(-3) | 192 | 0.26 | 12.8 | 41 | 268 | 1021 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 17.7 |
| (-1) | 120 | 0.25 | 13.5 | 42 | 219 | 851 | 5 | 4.4 | 16.9 |
| 0 | 307 | 0.3 | 12.7 | 41 | 327 | 1354 | 5.9 | 4.9 | 16.5 |
| 1 | 59 | 0.29 | 13.2 | 41 | 193 | 766 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 17.1 |
| 2–3 | 87 | 0.28 | 14.2 | 41 | 198 | 800 | 5 | 4.7 | 16.2 |
| 4 ≤ | 26 | 0.24 | 13.4 | 40 | 565b | 2077b | 2.8 | 2.6 | 18.9 |
| All 815 genes | 0.28 | 13.1 | 41 | 281 | 1075 | 5.1 | 4.2 | 16.9 |
a – Number of ribosomes in the parental strain (19) minus number in rps9-Δ188 strain (this study).
b – Values that differ significantly from the rest of the genes.
c – The abundance in the mutant was calculated from the transcriptome analysis by multiplying the relative expression in the mutant by values obtained from the wild-type strain (25).
Figure 4Comparison of ribosomal association between two halves of an mRNA by RDM. Polysomal fraction containing the majority of Yhb1 mRNA (A) or YGR026W mRNA (B) was collected from wild-type or rps9-Δ188 strains and mixed with RNase H and ODN complementary to the region indicated by an arrow on the schematic presentation of each mRNA. This should lead to a cleavage of the mRNA at the region complementary to the ODN and to result in two fragments: 5' fragment (depicted in black) and 3' fragment (depicted in white). Following the RNase H cleavage reaction, samples were separated on a sucrose gradient into 18 fractions and subjected to northern analysis. Hybridization for Yhb1 (A) was performed using a probe that recognizes the entire open reading frame, therefore both fragments appear in the same panel. Hybridization for YGR026W (B) was performed using probes specific either to the 5' or 3' fragments of the mRNA (upper and lower panels, respectively). Arrows to the left of each panel indicate the migration position of the cleavage product, as well as residual uncut mRNA ("full-length"). Histograms represent the quantitation results of the 5' fragment (black bars) and 3' fragment (white bars) of each mRNA.
Summary of the three experimental repeats of the RDM analysis
| First Repeata | Second Repeat | Third Repeat | |||||
| 5' half | 13.7 | 14.3 | 13.5 | 15.2 | 14.2 | 14.9 | |
| 3' half | 13.7 | 14.6 | 13.4 | 15.2 | 14.3 | 15.1 | |
| Differencee | 0 | 0.3 | -0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | |
| 5' third | 14 | 13.6 | 11.9 | 13.7 | 13.4 | 14.8 | |
| 3' third | 13.5 | 13.2 | 11.4 | 14.1 | 12.6 | 14.5 | |
| Differencee | -0.5 | -0.4 | -0.5 | 0.4 | -0.8 | -0.3 | |
| 5' half | 12.4 | 14.7 | 13.8 | 13.1 | 12.9 | 15.4 | |
| 3' half | 12.5 | 14.9 | 13.9 | 13.5 | 12.6 | 15.4 | |
| Differencee | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | -0.3 | 0 | |
Numbers indicate the weighted-average fraction for each fragment. They were obtained by summing the products of the relative signal in a fraction times the fraction number for all fractions with a signal above background.
a – This experimental repeat is presented in Figures 4 and 5.
b – Cleavage scheme as depicted in Figure 4A.
c – Cleavage scheme as depicted in Figure 5. Note that in the second and third repeats, the cleavage was done simultaneously with both ODNs added to the same sample. This enabled performing the entire procedure with a single sample (including separation on a single sucrose gradient and using northern analysis), therefore lowering the experimental error.
d – Cleavage scheme as depicted in Figure 4B.
e – Difference between the weighted-average fraction for the 3' fragment and the 5' fragment. This value represents the difference in sedimentation between the two fragments.
Figure 5Comparison of ribosomal association between two ends of an mRNA by RDM. A and B) Yhb1 mRNA was subjected to RDM analysis by addition of RNase H and ODN complementary to a region 314 nts (A) or 923 nts (B) downstream to the start codon (indicated by a lightning-symbol on the schematic presentation of Yhb1 mRNA). Cleavage by the RNase H and ODN at these positions is expected to yield a fragment containing the 5' third of the ORF (depicted in black) and a fragment containing the 3' third of the ORF (depicted in white). The RDM was performed on a fraction isolated from wild-type (panel i) or rps9-Δ188 (panel ii) strains. Unrelated polysomal fraction containing mRNAs associated with three ribosomes was added to each sample at the end of the reaction to serve as a common reference for the following separation step. Following the RNase H cleavage, samples were separated on a sucrose gradient into 18 fractions and subjected to northern blotting. The blots were first hybridized with Yhb1 probe (upper blots in each panel) and then with a probe to Rpp2A mRNA that sediments as associated with three ribosomes (lower blot in each panel). Arrows to the left of each panel indicate the migration position of the cleavage products as well as residual uncut mRNA ("full-length"). C) Quantitation results of the northern blots presented in A. Hatched bars in all panels present the signals of Rpp2A and black bars present the signal of the 5' fragment. D) Quantitation results of the northern blots presented in B. Hatched bars in all panels present the signals of Rpp2A and white bars present the signal of the 3' fragment.
Figure 6Luciferase assay to measure read-through efficiency. Parental strain (WT) or rps9-Δ188 strain were transformed with a plasmid carrying the luciferase gene with a single premature stop codon ("Stop") or two consecutive stop codons ("2× stop"). Luciferase activity was measured after the induction of luciferase expression by 2 hr growth in medium containing galactose. A sample of cells carrying the premature stop codon was treated with paromomycin for 90 min to induce read-through efficiency. Note that the activity of a normal luciferase gene under these experimental conditions was at least 100 times higher than the single premature stop gene (data not shown).
List of strains
| BY4741 | Euroscarf | |
| Y02747 | BY4741 | Euroscarf |
| Y16961 | BY4742 | Euroscarf |
| YA178 | BY4741 | This study |
| YA223 | This study | |
| YA226 | BY4741 | This study |
| YA227 | BY4741 | This study |
List of plasmids
| PA27 | pRS216 | |
| PA28 | pRS216 | |
| PA111 | pRS415 | |
| PA170 | pRS415 | |
| PA183 | pRS415 | |
| PA184 | pRS416 | |
| PA185 | pRS416 |