Literature DB >> 11500966

Statistical analysis of atomic contacts at RNA-protein interfaces.

M Treger1, E Westhof.   

Abstract

Forty-five crystals of complexes between proteins and RNA molecules from the Protein Data Bank have been statistically surveyed for the number of contacts between RNA components (phosphate, ribose and the four bases) and amino acid side chains. Three groups of complexes were defined: the tRNA synthetases; the ribosomal complexes; and a third group containing a variety of complexes. The types of atomic contacts were a priori classified into ionic, neutral H-bond, C-H...O H-bond, or van der Waals interaction. All the contacts were organized into a relational database which allows for statistical analysis. The main conclusions are the following: (i) in all three groups of complexes, the most preferred amino acids (Arg, Asn, Ser, Lys) and the less preferred ones (Ala, Ile, Leu, Val) are the same; Trp and Cys are rarely observed (respectively 15 and 5 amino acids in the ensemble of interfaces); (ii) of the total number of amino acids located at the interfaces 22% are hydrophobic, 40% charged (positive 32%, negative 8%), 30% polar and 8% are Gly; (iii) in ribosomal complexes, phosphate is preferred over ribose, which is preferred over the bases, but there is no significant preference in the other two groups; (iv) there is no significant prevalence of a base type at protein-RNA interfaces, but specifically Arg and Lys display a preference for phosphate over ribose and bases; Pro and Asn prefer bases over ribose and phosphate; Met, Phe and Tyr prefer ribose over phosphate and bases. Further, Ile, Pro, Ser prefer A over the others; Leu prefers C; Asp and Gly prefer G; and Asn prefers U. Considering the contact types, the following conclusions could be drawn: (i) 23% of the contacts are via potential H-bonds (including CH...O H-bonds and ionic interactions), 72% belong to van der Waals interactions and 5% are considered as short contacts; (ii) of all potential H-bonds, 54% are standard, 33% are of the C-H...O type and 13% are ionic; (iii) the Watson-Crick sites of G, O6(G) and principally N2(G) and the hydroxyl group O2' is more often involved in H-bonds than expected; the protein main chain is involved in 32% and the side chains in 68% of the H-bonds; considering the neutral and ionic H-bonds, the following couples are more frequent than expected-base A-Ser, base G-Asp/Glu, base U-Asn. The RNA CH groups interact preferentially with oxygen atoms (62% on the main chain and 19% on the side chains); (iv) the bases are involved in 38% of all H-bonds and more than 26% of the H-bonds have the H donor group on the RNA; (v) the atom O2' is involved in 21% of all H-bonds, a number greater than expected; (vi) amino acids less frequently in direct contact with RNA components interact frequently via their main chain atoms through water molecules with RNA atoms; in contrast, those frequently observed in direct contact, except Ser, use instead their side chain atoms for water bridging interactions. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11500966     DOI: 10.1002/jmr.534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Recognit        ISSN: 0952-3499            Impact factor:   2.137


  59 in total

1.  AANT: the Amino Acid-Nucleotide Interaction Database.

Authors:  Michael M Hoffman; Maksim A Khrapov; J Colin Cox; Jianchao Yao; Lingnan Tong; Andrew D Ellington
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A new hydrogen-bonding potential for the design of protein-RNA interactions predicts specific contacts and discriminates decoys.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Tanja Kortemme; Tim Robertson; David Baker; Gabriele Varani
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Anatomy of noncovalent interactions between the nucleobases or ribose and π-containing amino acids in RNA-protein complexes.

Authors:  Katie A Wilson; Ryan W Kung; Simmone D'souza; Stacey D Wetmore
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Structural study of the H/ACA snoRNP components Nop10p and the 3' hairpin of U65 snoRNA.

Authors:  May Khanna; Haihong Wu; Carina Johansson; Michèle Caizergues-Ferrer; Juli Feigon
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.942

5.  The 51-63 base pair of tRNA confers specificity for binding by EF-Tu.

Authors:  Lee E Sanderson; Olke C Uhlenbeck
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  3DNA: a versatile, integrated software system for the analysis, rebuilding and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic-acid structures.

Authors:  Xiang-Jun Lu; Wilma K Olson
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  Binding of the bacteriophage P22 N-peptide to the boxB RNA motif studied by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Ranjit P Bahadur; Srinivasaraghavan Kannan; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Prediction of interacting single-stranded RNA bases by protein-binding patterns.

Authors:  Alexandra Shulman-Peleg; Maxim Shatsky; Ruth Nussinov; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Quantifying sequence and structural features of protein-RNA interactions.

Authors:  Songling Li; Kazuo Yamashita; Karlou Mar Amada; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  How RNA-Binding Proteins Interact with RNA: Molecules and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Meredith Corley; Margaret C Burns; Gene W Yeo
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.