| Literature DB >> 31783868 |
Xueyun Zheng1,2, Yimin Zhang1,2, Xinying Zhang1,2, Cheng Li1,2, Xiaoxiao Liu1,2, Ying Lin3,4, Shuli Liang5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris is well-known for the production of a broad spectrum of functional types of heterologous proteins including enzymes, antigens, engineered antibody fragments, and next gen protein scaffolds and many transcription factors are utilized to address the burden caused by the high expression of heterologous proteins. In this article, a novel P. pastoris transcription factor currently annotated as Fhl1p, an activator of ribosome biosynthesis processing, was investigated for promoting the expression of the recombinant proteins.Entities:
Keywords: Enhanced protein production; Fhl1p; Pichia pastoris; Transcription factor; Translation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31783868 PMCID: PMC6884909 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-019-1256-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Fhl1p protein sequence comparison. Alignment of amino sequences of P. pastoris of Fhl1p and S. cerevisiae Fhl1p by the DNAMAN software. The amino acids were shown by one-letter codes. Gaps were introduced to maximize the similarity. In P. pastoris, the FH domain between amino acids 372 and 461 and its homologous region were marked by a black frame. A red line below the alignment was used to mark the FH positions of S. cerevisiae. An asterisk character was used to indicate positions that have a single, fully conserved residue
Fig. 2Characterization of the Fhl1p function on promoting the expression of recombinant protein. a Phytase expression levels when Fhl1p was overexpressed in the 6 phy strain. b Pectinase expression levels when Fhl1p was overexpressed in the 4 pel strain. c mRFP expression levels when Fhl1p was overexpressed in mRFP
Fig. 3Analysis of differential gene expression of the 4 pel/AF in comparison to 4 pel strain. Red arrows (↑) indicate an increasing and green arrows (↓) indicate a decreasing of the corresponding transcriptional levels in the methanol induction phase
Fig. 4Polysome profiles and (M + P):(40S + 60S) ratios for strains grown in methanol conditions. a Representative polysome profiles and b a chart presenting (M + P):(40S + 60S) ratios of the different strains. Corresponding peaks (40S, 60S, 80S/monosomes and polysomes) are indicated in the polysome profile. (M + P):(40S + 60S) ratios were calculated from areas beneath the profile curve using ImageJ