Literature DB >> 7037777

Codon selection in yeast.

J L Bennetzen, B D Hall.   

Abstract

Extreme codon bias is seen for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes for the fermentative alcohol dehydrogenase isozyme I (ADH-I) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Over 98% of the 1004 amino acid residues analyzed by DNA sequencing are coded for by a select 25 of the 61 possible coding triplets. These preferred codons tend to be highly homologous to the anticodons of the major yeast isoacceptor tRNA species. Codons which necessitate site by side GC base pairs between the codons and the tRNA anticodons are always avoided whenever possible. Codons containing 100% G, C, A, U, GC, or AU are also avoided. This provides for approximately equivalent codon-anticodon binding energies for all preferred triplets. All sequenced yeast genes show a distinct preference for these same 25 codons. The degree of preference varies from greater than 90% for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and ADH-I to less than 20% for iso-2 cytochrome c. The degree of bias for these 25 preferred triplets in each gene is correlated with the level of its mRNA in the cytoplasm. Genes which are strongly expressed are more biased than genes with a lower level of expression. A similar phenomenon is observed in the codon preferences of highly expressed genes in Escherichia coli. High levels of gene expression are well correlated with high levels of codon bias toward 22 of the 61 coding triplets. As in yeast, these preferred codons are highly complementary to the major cellular isoacceptor tRNA species. In at least four cases (Ala, Arg, Leu, and Val), these preferred E. coli codons are incompatible with the preferred yeast codons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7037777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  585 in total

1.  Recognition of protein coding genes in the yeast genome at better than 95% accuracy based on the Z curve.

Authors:  C T Zhang; J Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Nonrandom spatial distribution of synonymous substitutions in the GP63 gene from Leishmania.

Authors:  F Alvarez-Valin; J F Tort; G Bernardi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila.

Authors:  Jody Hey; Richard M Kliman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Regularities of context-dependent codon bias in eukaryotic genes.

Authors:  Alexei Fedorov; Serge Saxonov; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  PF-IND: probability algorithm and software for separation of plant and fungal sequences.

Authors:  R Maor; E Kosman; R Golobinski; P Goodwin; A Sharon
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 3.886

6.  Revisiting the codon adaptation index from a whole-genome perspective: analyzing the relationship between gene expression and codon occurrence in yeast using a variety of models.

Authors:  Ronald Jansen; Harmen J Bussemaker; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Use and misuse of correspondence analysis in codon usage studies.

Authors:  Guy Perrière; Jean Thioulouse
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  RADH, a gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding a putative DNA helicase involved in DNA repair. Characteristics of radH mutants and sequence of the gene.

Authors:  A Aboussekhra; R Chanet; Z Zgaga; C Cassier-Chauvat; M Heude; F Fabre
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Chromosomal localization and expression of CBS1, a translational activator of cytochrome b in yeast.

Authors:  V Forsbach; T Pillar; T Gottenöf; G Rödel
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1989-07

10.  Gene expression, intron density, and splice site strength in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Marie E Fahey; Desmond G Higgins
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.