Literature DB >> 22044975

Effect of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery skill acquisition.

M Zhou1, S Tse, A Derevianko, D B Jones, S D Schwaitzberg, C G L Cao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery training simulators is a topic of debate in the literature. It is hypothesized that novice surgeons may not benefit from the haptic information, especially during the initial phase of learning a new task. Therefore, provision of haptic feedback to novice trainees in the early stage of training may be distracting and detrimental to learning. A controlled experiment was conducted to examine the effect of haptic feedback on the learning curve of a complex laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying task.
METHODS: The ProMIS and the MIST-VR surgical simulators were used to represent conditions with and without haptic feedback, respectively. A total of 20 novice subjects (10 per simulator) were trained to perform suturing and knot-tying and practiced the tasks in 18 sessions of 1 h each.
RESULTS: At the end of the 3-week training period, the subjects performed equally fast but more consistently with haptics (ProMIS) than without haptics (MIST-VR). The subjects showed a slightly higher learning rate and reached the first plateau of the learning curve earlier with haptic feedback.
CONCLUSION: In general, learning with haptic feedback was significantly better than learning without it for a laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying task, but only during the first 5 h of training. Haptic feedback may not be warranted in laparoscopic surgical trainers. The benefits of a shorter time to the first performance plateau and more consistent initial performance should be balanced with the cost of implementing haptic feedback in surgical simulators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22044975      PMCID: PMC3321358          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2011-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills.

Authors:  C D Smith; T M Farrell; S S McNatt; R E Metreveli
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying.

Authors:  A M Pearson; A G Gallagher; J C Rosser; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents.

Authors:  P Ström; L Hedman; L Särnå; A Kjellin; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Novices in surgery are the target group of a virtual reality training laboratory.

Authors:  Iyad Hassan; Katja Maschuw; Matthias Rothmund; Michael Koller; Berthold Gerdes
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 1.745

5.  Effects of vision and friction on haptic perception.

Authors:  Jesse O Perreault; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  How much feedback is necessary for learning to suture?

Authors:  A O'Connor; S D Schwaitzberg; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation.

Authors:  Sanne M B I Botden; Fawaz Torab; Sonja N Buzink; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time?

Authors:  Caroline G L Cao; Mi Zhou; Daniel B Jones; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Surface exploration using laparoscopic surgical instruments: the perception of surface roughness.

Authors:  R Brydges; H Carnahan; A Dubrowski
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  Surgical simulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leanne M Sutherland; Philippa F Middleton; Adrian Anthony; Jeffrey Hamdorf; Patrick Cregan; David Scott; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  11 in total

1.  Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Thomas Langø; Ronald Mårvik; Magdalena Karolina Chmarra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Salient haptic skills trainer: initial validation of a novel simulator for training force-based laparoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  Ravikiran B Singapogu; Sarah DuBose; Lindsay O Long; Dane E Smith; Timothy C Burg; Christopher C Pagano; Karen J L Burg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Limitations of haptic feedback devices on construct validity of the LapSim® virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Lars Eirik Bø; Magdalena Karolina Chmarra; Esther Kuhry; Gjermund Johnsen; Ronald Mårvik; Thomas Langø
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Haptic simulators accelerate laparoscopic simulator training, but skills are not transferable to a non-haptic simulator: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Anishan Vamadevan; Lars Konge; Morten Stadeager; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Revisiting Pseudo-Haptics for Psychomotor Skills Development in Online Teaching.

Authors:  Bill Kapralos; Alvaro Quevedo; Celina Da Silva; Eva Peisachovich; K C Collins; Kamen Kanev; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-30

6.  A randomized control trial to evaluate the importance of pre-training basic laparoscopic psychomotor skills upon the learning curve of laparoscopic intra-corporeal knot tying.

Authors:  Carlos Roger Molinas; Maria Mercedes Binda; Cesar Manuel Sisa; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-12-20

7.  The Effect of Haptic Feedback on Efficiency and Safety During Preretinal Membrane Peeling Simulation.

Authors:  Anibal Francone; Jason Mingyi Huang; Ji Ma; Tsu-Chin Tsao; Jacob Rosen; Jean-Pierre Hubschman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  The Role of Deconstructive Teaching in the Training of Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Dimitrios Balafoutas; Ralf Joukhadar; Matthias Kiesel; Sebastian Häusler; Sanja Loeb; Achim Woeckel; Daniel Herr
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques.

Authors:  Manuneethimaran Thiyagarajan; Chandru Ravindrakumar
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2016-02-28

10.  Dominant hand, non-dominant hand, or both? The effect of pre-training in hand-eye coordination upon the learning curve of laparoscopic intra-corporeal knot tying.

Authors:  Carlos Roger Molinas; Maria Mercedes Binda; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.