Literature DB >> 8426870

SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging: I. A practical approach based on statistical decision theory.

M J Tapiovaara1, R F Wagner.   

Abstract

A method of measuring the image quality of medical imaging equipment is considered within the framework of statistical decision theory. In this approach, images are regarded as random vectors and image quality is defined in the context of the image information available for performing a specified detection or discrimination task. The approach provides a means of measuring image quality, as related to the detection of an image detail of interest, without reference to the actual physical mechanisms involved in image formation and without separate measurements of signal transfer characteristics or image noise. The measurement does not, however, consider deterministic errors in the image; they need a separate evaluation for imaging modalities where they are of concern. The detectability of an image detail can be expressed in terms of the ideal observer's signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the decision level. Often a good approximation to this SNR can be obtained by employing sub-optimal observers, whose performance correlates well with the performance of human observers as well. In this paper the measurement of SNR is based on implementing algorithmic realizations of specified observers and analysing their responses while actually performing a specified detection task of interest. Three observers are considered: the ideal prewhitening matched filter, the non-prewhitening matched filter, and the DC-suppressing non-prewhitening matched filter. The construction of the ideal observer requires an impractical amount of data and computing, except for the most simple imaging situations. Therefore, the utilization of sub-optimal observers is advised and their performance in detecting a specified signal is discussed. Measurement of noise and SNR has been extended to include temporally varying images and dynamic imaging systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8426870     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/38/1/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  18 in total

1.  Can electronic zoom replace magnification in mammography? A comparative Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  M Koutalonis; H Delis; A Pascoal; G Spyrou; L Costaridou; G Panayiotakis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Optimization of beam quality for photon-counting spectral computed tomography in head imaging: simulation study.

Authors:  Han Chen; Cheng Xu; Mats Persson; Mats Danielsson
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-11-06

3.  Superresolved labeling nanoscopy based on temporally flickering nanoparticles and the K-factor image deshadowing.

Authors:  Tali Ilovitsh; Yossef Danan; Asaf Ilovitsh; Amihai Meiri; Rinat Meir; Zeev Zalevsky
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Optimum tomographic reconstruction parameters for HMPAO brain SPET imaging: a practical approach based on subjective and objective indexes.

Authors:  P O Kotzki; D Mariano-Goulart; M Quiquere; F Lyonnet; M Zanca; M Rossi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-07

5.  Novel method to determine recursive filtration and noise reduction in fluoroscopic imaging - a comparison of four different vendors.

Authors:  Bente Konst; Jacob Nøtthellen; Stine Nalum Naess; Magnus Båth
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  An alternate method for using a visual discrimination model (VDM) to optimize soft-copy display image quality.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.140

7.  Assessing Stability of Crutch Users by Non-Contact Methods.

Authors:  Achilles Vairis; Suzana Brown; Maurice Bess; Kyu Hyun Bae; Jonathan Boyack
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: noise reduction techniques.

Authors:  S Cheenu Kappadath; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A novel method for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) evaluation of digital mammography detectors.

Authors:  P Baldelli; N Phelan; G Egan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Assessment of frame-averaging algorithms in OCT image analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Ou Tan; Rajeev R Pappuru; Huilong Duan; David Huang
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.