E Samei1, M J Flynn, W R Eyler. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the relative influence of quantum mottle and structured lung patterns (anatomic noise) on the detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty 8 x 8-cm lung pattern images were extracted from digital chest radiographs in healthy individuals. Sixty quantum mottle images of the same size and quantum noise level were extracted from uniformly exposed digital radiographs. Simulated nodules with various peak contrast-diameter products (CD) that emulated subtle tissue-equivalent lung nodules were numerically superimposed at the center on three-fourths of the images. Printouts were independently viewed and scored by five experienced radiologists. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) was estimated as a measure of the detectability of the nodules. RESULTS: At a fixed observer performance level (e.g., Az = 0.8), much smaller and lower-contrast nodules were detected on quantum mottle images (1-mm diameter, CD = 0.01 mm), compared with those on anatomic images (4.5-mm diameter, CD = 0.20 mm). The findings generally agreed with the signal-to-noise ratio calculations based on statistical observer models. CONCLUSION: The detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs is limited by anatomic noise.
PURPOSE: To assess the relative influence of quantum mottle and structured lung patterns (anatomic noise) on the detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty 8 x 8-cm lung pattern images were extracted from digital chest radiographs in healthy individuals. Sixty quantum mottle images of the same size and quantum noise level were extracted from uniformly exposed digital radiographs. Simulated nodules with various peak contrast-diameter products (CD) that emulated subtle tissue-equivalent lung nodules were numerically superimposed at the center on three-fourths of the images. Printouts were independently viewed and scored by five experienced radiologists. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) was estimated as a measure of the detectability of the nodules. RESULTS: At a fixed observer performance level (e.g., Az = 0.8), much smaller and lower-contrast nodules were detected on quantum mottle images (1-mm diameter, CD = 0.01 mm), compared with those on anatomic images (4.5-mm diameter, CD = 0.20 mm). The findings generally agreed with the signal-to-noise ratio calculations based on statistical observer models. CONCLUSION: The detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs is limited by anatomic noise.
Authors: Sarah J Boyce; H Page McAdams; Carl E Ravin; Edward F Patz; Lacey Washington; Santiago Martinez; Lynne Koweek; Ehsan Samei Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: P Prakash; W Zbijewski; G J Gang; Y Ding; J W Stayman; J Yorkston; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Juergen Biederer; Tobias Gottwald; Hendrik Bolte; Christian Riedel; Sandra Freitag; Richard Van Metter; Martin Heller Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-09-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mark Ruschin; Pontus Timberg; Magnus Båth; Bengt Hemdal; Tony Svahn; Rob S Saunders; Ehsan Samei; Ingvar Andersson; Soren Mattsson; Dev P Chakrabort; Anders Tingber Journal: Med Phys Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.071