OBJECTIVE: Tailored, interactive mammography-promotion interventions can increase adherence if women are exposed to and find them usable. We compare exposure to and usability of interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD. METHODS: Process evaluation measures from 926 women randomly assigned totelephone or DVD intervention and completing post-intervention surveys. RESULTS: ∼83% of each group reported exposure to all content. Partial exposure was higher for DVD (9% vs. 0.4%; p<.01); no exposure was higher for phone (15% vs. 8%; p<.01). There were no differences in exposure by age or race. Full phone exposure was less likely for women who already made mammography appointments. Usability rating was higher for DVD (p<.05), driven by ratings of understandability and length. Usability of both interventions was correlated with lower baseline barriers, and higher fear, benefits, and self efficacy. Higher ratings for phone were associated with lower knowledge and contemplating mammography. Non-whites rated DVD better than whites. CONCLUSION: Both tailored interactive interventions had wide reach and favorable ratings, but DVD recipients had greatest exposure to at least partial content and more favorable ratings, especially among non-white women. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This first evaluation of a tailored, interactive DVD provides promise for its use in mammography promotion.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Tailored, interactive mammography-promotion interventions can increase adherence if women are exposed to and find them usable. We compare exposure to and usability of interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD. METHODS: Process evaluation measures from 926 women randomly assigned to telephone or DVD intervention and completing post-intervention surveys. RESULTS: ∼83% of each group reported exposure to all content. Partial exposure was higher for DVD (9% vs. 0.4%; p<.01); no exposure was higher for phone (15% vs. 8%; p<.01). There were no differences in exposure by age or race. Full phone exposure was less likely for women who already made mammography appointments. Usability rating was higher for DVD (p<.05), driven by ratings of understandability and length. Usability of both interventions was correlated with lower baseline barriers, and higher fear, benefits, and self efficacy. Higher ratings for phone were associated with lower knowledge and contemplating mammography. Non-whites rated DVD better than whites. CONCLUSION: Both tailored interactive interventions had wide reach and favorable ratings, but DVD recipients had greatest exposure to at least partial content and more favorable ratings, especially among non-white women. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This first evaluation of a tailored, interactive DVD provides promise for its use in mammography promotion.
Authors: Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Victoria L Champion; Jeffrey K Springston; Terry W Zollinger; Robert M Saywell; Patrick O Monahan; Qianqian Zhao; Kathleen M Russell Journal: Cancer Detect Prev Date: 2006-11-15
Authors: Lennarth Nyström; Ingvar Andersson; Nils Bjurstam; Jan Frisell; Bo Nordenskjöld; Lars Erik Rutqvist Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-03-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Barbara K Rimer; Susan Halabi; Celette Sugg Skinner; Isaac M Lipkus; Tara S Strigo; Ellen B Kaplan; Gregory P Samsa Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Hannah K Weir; Michael J Thun; Benjamin F Hankey; Lynn A G Ries; Holly L Howe; Phyllis A Wingo; Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward; Robert N Anderson; Brenda K Edwards Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Susan M Rawl; Shannon M Christy; Patrick O Monahan; Yan Ding; Connie Krier; Victoria L Champion; Douglas Rex Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2015-05-28
Authors: Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi; Patrick O Monahan; Timothy Stump; Susan M Rawl; Celette Sugg Skinner; Victoria L Champion Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2016-02
Authors: Adam H Buchanan; Corrine I Voils; Joellen M Schildkraut; Catherine Fine; Nora K Horick; P Kelly Marcom; Kristi Wiggins; Celette Sugg Skinner Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Victoria L Champion; Susan M Rawl; Sara A Bourff; Kristen M Champion; Lisa G Smith; Adam H Buchanan; Laura J Fish; Patrick O Monahan; Timothy E Stump; Jeffery K Springston; Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi; Celette Sugg Skinner Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2014-07-28