BACKGROUND: Regular adherence to screening mammography, also known as maintenance of mammography, reduces breast cancer morbidity and mortality. However, mammography maintenance is uncommon and little is known about why women do not maintain regular screening schedules. We investigated longitudinal predictors of women not maintaining adherence. METHODS: Participants were insured women enrolled in an intervention trial who had screening mammograms 8 to 9 months before study enrollment (n = 1,493). Data were collected from 2003 to 2008. We used discrete event history analysis to model nonadherence to mammography maintenance over three successive annual screening intervals (+ 2 months). RESULTS: Most (54%) women did not maintain screening adherence over 3 years. Women who did not maintain adherence were more likely to be ages 40 to 49 years, rate their health fair or poor, be less satisfied with their last mammography experiences, report one or more barriers to getting mammograms, be less than completely confident about getting their next mammograms (lower self-efficacy), or have weaker behavioral intentions. The odds of not maintaining adherence decreased over time. DISCUSSION: Although great strides have been achieved in increasing the proportion of women who have received mammograms, most women still are not maintaining regular mammography use over time. Our findings provide insights into targets for future mammography maintenance interventions.
BACKGROUND: Regular adherence to screening mammography, also known as maintenance of mammography, reduces breast cancer morbidity and mortality. However, mammography maintenance is uncommon and little is known about why women do not maintain regular screening schedules. We investigated longitudinal predictors of women not maintaining adherence. METHODS:Participants were insured women enrolled in an intervention trial who had screening mammograms 8 to 9 months before study enrollment (n = 1,493). Data were collected from 2003 to 2008. We used discrete event history analysis to model nonadherence to mammography maintenance over three successive annual screening intervals (+ 2 months). RESULTS: Most (54%) women did not maintain screening adherence over 3 years. Women who did not maintain adherence were more likely to be ages 40 to 49 years, rate their health fair or poor, be less satisfied with their last mammography experiences, report one or more barriers to getting mammograms, be less than completely confident about getting their next mammograms (lower self-efficacy), or have weaker behavioral intentions. The odds of not maintaining adherence decreased over time. DISCUSSION: Although great strides have been achieved in increasing the proportion of women who have received mammograms, most women still are not maintaining regular mammography use over time. Our findings provide insights into targets for future mammography maintenance interventions.
Authors: Barbara K Rimer; Susan Halabi; Celette Sugg Skinner; Isaac M Lipkus; Tara S Strigo; Ellen B Kaplan; Gregory P Samsa Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Melissa A Clark; William Rakowski; Beverly Ehrich; Barbara K Rimer; Wayne F Velicer; Catherine E Dube; Deborah N Pearlman; Kristen K Peterson; Michael Goldstein Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Traci LeMasters; Elvonna Atkins; Sara Gainor; Stephenie Kennedy; Kimberly Kelly; Linda Vona-Davis; Scot Remick Journal: J Community Health Date: 2012-06
Authors: Shoshana M Rosenberg; Ines Vaz-Luis; Jingyi Gong; Padma Sheila Rajagopal; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Lidia Schapira; Steven Come; Virginia Borges; Janet S de Moor; Ann H Partridge Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Eliza M Park; Shari Gelber; Shoshana M Rosenberg; Davinia S E Seah; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Ann H Partridge Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Terry C Davis; Connie L Arnold; Charles L Bennett; Michael S Wolf; Dachao Liu; Alfred Rademaker Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Elisabeth F Beaber; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Marilyn M Schapira; Anne Marie McCarthy; Christopher I Li; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman; Karen J Wernli; William E Barlow Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Ana María Salinas-Martínez; Jimena Estefanía Gaspar-Rivera; Oscar Juárez-Pérez; José Roberto Montañez-Sauceda; Georgina Mayela Núñez-Rocha; Francisco Javier Guzmán-de-la-Garza; Álvaro Mathiew-Quirós Journal: J Community Health Date: 2017-04