Literature DB >> 11988381

Effects of a mammography decision-making intervention at 12 and 24 months.

Barbara K Rimer1, Susan Halabi, Celette Sugg Skinner, Isaac M Lipkus, Tara S Strigo, Ellen B Kaplan, Gregory P Samsa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most women are not getting regular mammograms, and there is confusion about several mammography-related issues, including the age at which women should begin screening. Numerous groups have called for informed decision making about mammography, but few programs have resulted. Our research is intended to fill this gap.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial, which ran from 1997 to 2000. Women aged 40 to 44 and 50 to 54, who were enrolled in Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina, were randomly assigned to one of three groups: usual care (UC), tailored print (TP) materials, or TP plus tailored telephone counseling (TP+TC). We assessed the impact of tailored interventions on knowledge about breast cancer and mammography, accuracy of breast cancer risk perceptions, and use of mammography at two time points after intervention-12 and 24 months.
RESULTS: At 12 and 24 months, women who received TP+TC had significantly greater knowledge and more accurate breast cancer risk perceptions. Compared to UC, they were 40% more likely to have had mammograms (odds ratio=0.9-2.1). The effect was primarily for women in their 50s. TP had significant effects for knowledge and accuracy, but women who received TP were less likely to have had mammography.
CONCLUSIONS: Decision-making interventions, comprised of two tailored print interventions (booklet and newsletter), delivered a year apart, with or without two tailored telephone calls, significantly increased knowledge and accuracy of perceived breast cancer risk at 12 and 24 months post-intervention. The effect on mammography use was significant in bivariate relationships but had a much more modest impact in multivariate analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11988381     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00417-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  45 in total

1.  Impact of a health communication intervention to improve glaucoma treatment adherence. Results of the interactive study to increase glaucoma adherence to treatment trial.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Allen D Beck; Lucja Bundy; Susan Primo; Michael J Lynn; Julia Cleveland; Jessica A Wold; Katharina V Echt
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10

Review 2.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Casey L Luce; Evette Ludman; Amy E Bonomi; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Intentions to maintain adherence to mammography.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; J Michael Bowling; Noel T Brewer; Isaac M Lipkus; Celette Sugg Skinner; Tara S Strigo; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  The Effect of Educational Intervention Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior on Mammography Screening in Iranian Women.

Authors:  Ali Khani Jeihooni; Niloofar Darvishi; Pooyan Afzali Harsini
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Communicating with women about mammography.

Authors:  Berta M Geller; Jane Zapka; Solveig S-H Hofvind; Astrid Scharpantgen; Livia Giordano; Noriaki Ohuchi; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

8.  Do patient attributes predict oncologist empathic responses and patient perceptions of empathy?

Authors:  Kathryn I Pollak; Robert Arnold; Stewart C Alexander; Amy S Jeffreys; Maren K Olsen; Amy P Abernethy; Keri L Rodriguez; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Approaches to improving breast screening uptake: evidence and experience from Tower Hamlets.

Authors:  K W Eilbert; K Carroll; J Peach; S Khatoon; I Basnett; N McCulloch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Interventions to promote cancer awareness and early presentation: systematic review.

Authors:  J Austoker; C Bankhead; L J L Forbes; L Atkins; F Martin; K Robb; J Wardle; A J Ramirez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.